Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Feb 27, 2022; 14(2): 132-142
Published online Feb 27, 2022. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i2.132
Table 2 Comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography related contents of choledocholithiasis with periampullary diverticulum between Lanzhou and Kyoto
ERCP Item
Lanzhou (n = 829)
Kyoto (n = 241)
P
Intubation failure, n (%)8 (1.0)1 (0.4)0.69
Intubation difficulty, n (%)80 (9.7)58 (24.1)< 0.001
Difficulty to remove stone out, n (%)290 (35.3)127 (53.8)< 0.001
Residual stone, n (%)62 (7.6)58 (24.6)< 0.001
Procedure to duodenal papilla, n (%)
EST Only419 (50.5)217 (90.0)< 0.001
EST + EPBD352 (42.5)1 (0.4)< 0.001
EPBD only14 (1.7)0 (0.0)0.049
Non-EST & non-EPBD44 (5.3)23 (9.5)0.017
Post-complication (overall), n (%)74 (8.9)14 (5.8)0.12
Acute cholangitis22 (2.7)1 (0.4)0.035
Acute pancreatitis49 (5.9)8 (3.3)0.11
Perforation2 (0.2)0 (0.0)1.00
Bleeding0 (0.0)5 (2.1)< 0.001

  • Citation: Zhu KX, Yue P, Wang HP, Meng WB, Liu JK, Zhang L, Zhu XL, Zhang H, Miao L, Wang ZF, Zhou WC, Suzuki A, Tanaka K, Li X. Choledocholithiasis characteristics with periampullary diverticulum and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures: Comparison between two centers from Lanzhou and Kyoto. World J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 14(2): 132-142
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v14/i2/132.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v14.i2.132