Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Dec 27, 2022; 14(12): 1397-1410
Published online Dec 27, 2022. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i12.1397
Published online Dec 27, 2022. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i12.1397
Figure 3 Forest plots of comparison.
A: Intraoperative complications; B: Postoperative complications; C: Anastomotic leak; D: R0 resection; E: Completeness of mesorectal excision; F: Number of harvested lymph nodes; G: Distal resection margin; H: Circumferential resection margin; I: Positive circumferential resection margin; J: Procedure time; K: Conversion to an open procedure. The solid squares denote the odds ratios or mean difference. The horizontal lines represent the 95% confidence intervals, and the diamond denotes the pooled effect size. M-H: Mantel Haenszel test.
- Citation: Bhattacharya P, Patel I, Fazili N, Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S. Meta-analysis of transanal vs laparoscopic total mesorectal excision of low rectal cancer: Importance of appropriate patient selection. World J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 14(12): 1397-1410
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v14/i12/1397.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v14.i12.1397