Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Nov 27, 2022; 14(11): 1250-1259
Published online Nov 27, 2022. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i11.1250
Published online Nov 27, 2022. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i11.1250
Variables | Controls (n = 78) | AL patients (n = 78) | P value |
BMI (SD), kg/m2 | 23.05 (3.05) | 23.17 (2.88) | 0.797 |
AC, mean (SD), cm | 87.00 (10.94) | 89.71 (14.20) | 0.120 |
SFA, mean (SD), cm2 | 108.72 (54.12) | 113.72 (55.87) | 0.571 |
SFT, mean (SD), mm | 18.68 (8.20) | 18.03 (7.31) | 0.601 |
SMA, mean (SD), cm2 | 127.89 (29.57) | 132.06 (33.40) | 0.410 |
SMI, mean (SD), cm2/m2 | 46.00 (8.81) | 47.10 (10.57) | 0.482 |
VFA, mean (SD), cm2 | 97.03 (57.66) | 125.68 (73.59) | 0.008 |
APD, mean (SD), mm | 92.09 (26.40) | 77.30 (23.23) | < 0.001 |
TD, mean (SD), cm | 24.21 (2.90) | 22.90 (2.23) | 0.002 |
- Citation: Shao SL, Li YK, Qin JC, Liu L. Comprehensive abdominal composition evaluation of rectal cancer patients with anastomotic leakage compared with body mass index-matched controls. World J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 14(11): 1250-1259
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v14/i11/1250.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v14.i11.1250