Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jan 27, 2022; 14(1): 12-23
Published online Jan 27, 2022. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i1.12
Published online Jan 27, 2022. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i1.12
GPOEM | ||
PRO | High clinical success rate (71%-100%) | |
High technical success rate (100%) | ||
Less perioperative morbidity and operating time than surgery pyloromyotomy | ||
Minimally invasive | ||
Short hospitalization time | ||
Positive predictive factors | Lower starting GCSI | |
Fewer symptoms | ||
Idiopathic and post-surgical GP | ||
CONS | Limited to tertiary care center and very expert physicians | |
Risk of pneumoperitoneum and abdominal pain | ||
Poorer results for diabetic GP and female |
- Citation: Verga MC, Mazza S, Azzolini F, Cereatti F, Conti CB, Drago A, Soro S, Elvo B, Grassia R. Gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy: Indications, technique, results and comparison with surgical approach. World J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 14(1): 12-23
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v14/i1/12.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v14.i1.12