Advances in endoscopic therapy using grasping-type scissors forceps (with video)

Table 2 Reported clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection using the clutch cutter

Ref.	Organ	Numberof patients	Histology	Procedure time, min	En bloc (R0) resection rate %	Perforation rate % (n)	Delayed bleeding rate % (n)	Surgical1 intervention rate % (n)
Sawas et al[18], 2018	Esophagus	14	ADCA, DYS	ND	100 (41.6)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)
Esaki et al[19], 2020	Esophagus	36	SCC	56.4	88.9 (80.6)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)
Hanada et al[20], 2020	Esophagus	96	ADCA, DYS, SCC	78.3	94.3 (ND)	0 (0)	1.4 (2)	0 (0)
Akahoshi et al[6], 2015	Stomach	325	ADCA	97.2	99.7 (95.3)	0.3 (1)	3.4 (11)	0 (0)
Nagai et al[21], 2016	Stomach	56	ADCA, ADM	66	93 (ND)	3.6 (2)	3.6 (2)	0 (0)
Hayashi et al[22], 2018	Stomach	50	ADCA	49	100 (100)	0 (0)	2.3 (1)	0 (0)
Dohi et al[23], 2019	Stomach	61	ADCA	44	100 (93.4)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)
Dohi et al[24], 2020	Duodenum	47	ADCA, ADM	36	100 (97.9)	2.1 (1)	4.2 (2)	0 (0)
Akahoshi et al[8], 2019	Colorectum	437	ADCA, ADM	88.3	99.3 (87.0)	2.3 (10)	2.3 (10)	0 (0)
Yoshida et al[12], 2019	Colorectum	51	ND	56	98 (ND)	2.0 (ND)	0 (0)	ND

¹Surgical intervention owing to endoscopic submucosal dissection-related complications. ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; SCC: Squamous cell carcinoma; ADCA: Adenocarcinoma; DYS: Dysplasia; ADM: Adenoma; ND: Not described.