Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jul 27, 2021; 13(7): 645-654
Published online Jul 27, 2021. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i7.645
Published online Jul 27, 2021. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i7.645
Ref. | Study design | Lesions, n | Mean tumor size (range), cm | Site (cardia/antrum/ body/fundus) | R0 | Surgical conversion | Suture technique | Suture technical success | Mean operation time (range), min | Mean suture time (range), min | Major adverse events | |
Guo et al[25], 2015 | R | 23 | 1.21 ± 0.47 (0.6-2.0) | 0/3/9/11 | 23 | 0 | OTSC | 23 | 40.5 ± 25.8 (16–104) | 4.9 ± 2.2 (2–12) | 0 | |
Wang et al[26], 2019 | CS | 2 | 1.1 (1-1.2) | 0/0/1/1 | 2 | 0 | OTSC | 2 | 108.5 (48-121) | 43 (16-70) | 0 | |
Hu et al[27], 2020 | R | 20 | 2.4 ± 0.26 (-) | 0/0/0/20 | 20 | 0 | OTSC +/- clips | 20 | 130.6 ± 51.9 (-) | - | 0 |
- Citation: Granata A, Martino A, Ligresti D, Zito FP, Amata M, Lombardi G, Traina M. Closure techniques in exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection: Overview and future perspectives in the endoscopic suturing era. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13(7): 645-654
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v13/i7/645.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v13.i7.645