Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Nov 27, 2021; 13(11): 1372-1389
Published online Nov 27, 2021. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i11.1372
Published online Nov 27, 2021. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i11.1372
Figure 4 The comparison of overall survival between “One-step” approach and “Step-up” approach.
A: The mean follow-up time was 69.17 ± 2.53 mo (95%CI: 64.02-74.16). There are 31 patients died, 24 patients lost to follow-up and 103 patients survived, respectively; B: There are 12 patients died in “One-step” approach. Among them, 8 patients died during the hospitalization and 4 patients died in follow-up period, respectively. In addition, there are 19 patients died in “Step-up” approach, among them, 12 patients died during the hospitalization and 7 patients died in follow-up period, respectively. The rate of overall survival between “One-step” and “Step-up” was 10% and 11.1%, respectively (P = 0.875).
- Citation: Zheng Z, Lu JD, Ding YX, Guo YL, Mei WT, Qu YX, Cao F, Li F. Comparison of safety, efficacy, and long-term follow-up between “one-step” and “step-up” approaches for infected pancreatic necrosis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13(11): 1372-1389
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v13/i11/1372.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v13.i11.1372