Long-term survival of patients with stage II and III gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy with inadequate nodal assessment

doi:10.4240/wjgs.v13.i11.1463

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 13, Issue 11

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (4045)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-5) series, Tables (1-6) series.

Item

Count

PDF

204

WORD

HTML

1796

Figures (1-5)

428

Tables (1-6)

143

Sum=2638

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

407

Download

1000

Sum=1407

Nov 27, 2021 (publication date) through Jul 19, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (3)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

ISSN

1948-9366

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Observational Study

World J Gastrointest Surg. Nov 27, 2021; 13(11): 1463-1483
Published online Nov 27, 2021. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i11.1463

Table 1 Sample characteristics, n (%)

Characteristic	n (%)
Year of diagnosis
2004-2006	3142 (27)
2007-2009	3028 (26)
2010-2012	2850 (25)
2013-2015	2587 (22)
Age at diagnosis (yr)
Median (range)	69 (12-99)
Sex
Male	6697 (58)
Female	4910 (42)
Race
White	7045 (61)
Black	2076 (18)
Asian/Pacific	2486 (21)
Marital status
Single/divorced	2539 (22)
Married	6805 (58)
Widowed	1837 (16)
NA	426 (4)
Insurance status
Insured	8033 (69)
Uninsured	432 (4)
NA	3142 (27)
Site of tumor
Fundus/body	1866 (16)
Antrum/pylorus	4626 (40)
Overlapping lesion	1299 (11)
Stomach, NOS	3816 (33)
Tumor size (cm)
≤ 5	5431 (47)
5.1-10	4203 (36)
≥ 10.1	1135 (10)
NA	838 (7)
Histology
ADC, NOS	4481 (39)
Signet ring cell carcinoma	2726 (23)
ADC, instestinal type	1943 (17)
Carcinoma, diffuse type	958 (8)
ADC with mixed subtypes	424 (4)
Other	1075 (9)
Grade
Well/moderately differentiated	2674 (23)
Poorly/undifferentiated	8524 (73)
NA	409 (4)
T stage, 8^th ed.
T1	290 (2)
T2	943 (8)
T3	5569 (48)
T4a	3551 (31)
T4b	1254 (11)
N stage, 8^th ed.
N0	2863 (25)
N1	2422 (21)
N2	2757 (24)
N3a	2498 (21)
N3b	1067 (9)
Stage, 8^th ed.
IIA	2585 (22)
IIB	2129 (18)
IIIA	3049 (26)
IIIB	2511 (22)
IIIC	1333 (12)
Chemotherapy
Yes	6473 (56)
No	5134 (44)
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Yes	1255 (11)
No	10352 (89)
Radiotherapy
Yes	4285 (37)
No	7322 (63)
Type of surgery
Partial gastrectomy	8320 (72)
Total gastrectomy	3287 (28)
Number of retrieved lymphnodes
< 16 LNs (ILA)	5806 (50)
16-29 LNs (ALA)	4085 (35)
≥ 30 LNs (OLA)	1716 (15)

ADC: Adenocarcinoma; ALA: Adequate lymph node assessment; ILA: Inadequate lymph node assessment; LN: Lymph node; NA: Not available, NOS: Not otherwise specified; OLA: Optimal lymph node assessment.

Citation: Desiderio J, Sagnotta A, Terrenato I, Garofoli E, Mosillo C, Trastulli S, Arteritano F, Tozzi F, D'Andrea V, Fong Y, Woo Y, Bracarda S, Parisi A. Long-term survival of patients with stage II and III gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy with inadequate nodal assessment. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13(11): 1463-1483
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v13/i11/1463.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v13.i11.1463