Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Jan 27, 2021; 13(1): 30-49
Published online Jan 27, 2021. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i1.30
Published online Jan 27, 2021. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i1.30
Table 9 Literature review of the largest series of cystic dystrophy of the duodenal wall treatment
| Ref. | Year | CDDW patients (n) | Pure form of CDDW | Surgery1 | PD2 | PPDR2 |
| Stolte et al[8] | 1982 | 30 | 11 (37%) | 30 (100%1) | 30 (100%) | - |
| Jouannaud et al[4] | 2006 | 23 | 0 | 14 (61%1) | 10 (71%) | - |
| Rebours et al[5] | 2007 | 105 | 30 (29%) | 29 (28%) | 17 (59%) | - |
| Tison et al[35] | 2007 | 9 | 5 (56%) | 9 (100%1) | 9 (100%) | - |
| de Pretis et al[17] | 2017 | 82 | 22 (27%) | 57 (69.5%1) | 51(89%) | - |
| Our data | 82 | 18 (22%) | 70 (85%) | 42 (60%) | 15 (21%) | |
| Overall | 331 | 86 | 209 | 159 | 15 |
- Citation: Egorov V, Petrov R, Schegolev A, Dubova E, Vankovich A, Kondratyev E, Dobriakov A, Kalinin D, Schvetz N, Poputchikova E. Pancreas-preserving duodenal resections vs pancreatoduodenectomy for groove pancreatitis. Should we revisit treatment algorithm for groove pancreatitis? World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13(1): 30-49
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v13/i1/30.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v13.i1.30