Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Mar 27, 2020; 12(3): 104-115
Published online Mar 27, 2020. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v12.i3.104
Published online Mar 27, 2020. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v12.i3.104
Table 2 Treatment modalities, follow-up
| Treatment modalities | |||
| Intervention | Σ = 114 | ||
| Yes | 28 | 24.6% | |
| No | 86 | 75.4% | |
| Management | Σ = 105 | ||
| Conservative | 79 | 75.2% | |
| Surgical | 11 | 10.5% | |
| Endoscopic | 13 | 12.4% | |
| Endoscopic + surgical | 2 | 1.9% | |
| Follow-up endoscopy | Yes | 67 | 58.8% |
| Complications | Yes | 14 | 12.3% |
| Death | Yes | 32 | 29.9% |
| FUP (overall; mean; SD) | 66.2 ± 101.8 | 90 | 90/114 |
| FUP (dead; mean; SD) | 16.6 ± 21.8 | 23 | 23/32 |
| FUP (alive; mean; SD) | 82.9 ± 113.2 | 65 | 65/75 |
- Citation: Schizas D, Theochari NA, Mylonas KS, Kanavidis P, Spartalis E, Triantafyllou S, Economopoulos KP, Theodorou D, Liakakos T. Acute esophageal necrosis: A systematic review and pooled analysis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2020; 12(3): 104-115
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v12/i3/104.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v12.i3.104