Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Dec 27, 2020; 12(12): 507-519
Published online Dec 27, 2020. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v12.i12.507
Table 2 Operative details and outcomes and computed tomography measurements in the compared groups
Overall (n = 148)SOO (+) (n = 25)SOO (-) (n = 123)P value
Surgical approach
Laparoscopy146 (98.6%)25 (100.0%)121 (98.4%)1.000
Open2 (1.4%)0 (0.0%)2 (1.6%)
Site of stoma
Right85 (57.4%)10 (40.0%)75 (61.0%)0.053
Left63 (42.6%)15 (60.0%)48 (39.0%)
Type of stoma
End58 (39.2%)3 (12.0%)55 (44.7%)0.002
Loop90 (60.8%)22 (88.0%)68 (55.3%)
Operative time1 (min), (range)346 (208-631)339 (234-595)347 (208-631)0.890
Intraoperative bleeding1 (mL), (range)73.5 (4-1316)51 (5-811)80 (4-1316)0.310
Maximum stoma drainage volume1 (mL), (range)1800 (150-7800)2300 (450-5230)1690 (150-7800)0.004
Days from surgery to maximum stoma drainage volume1 (d), (range)6 (1-22)8 (2-21)4 (1-22)0.326
Adhesions below the ileostomy2
Yes21 (22.8%)7 (35.0%)14 (19.4%)0.123
None71 (77.2%)13 (65.0%)58 (80.6%)
Rectus abdominal muscle thickness at umbilical level1 (mm), (range)9.6 (3.6-15.7)10.4 (6.1-14.2)9.6 (3.6-15.7)0.189
Subcutaneous fat thickness at umbilical level1 (mm), (range)15.5 (2.4-52.3)11.6 (6.6-36.0)16.3 (2.4-52.3)0.051