Case Report
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastrointest Surg. Nov 27, 2020; 12(11): 460-467
Published online Nov 27, 2020. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v12.i11.460
Table 3 Previous report of only using endoscopic radical incision and cutting for anastomotic stenosis (review of the literature)

Kawaguti et al[12]
Harada et al[14]
Osera et al[11]
Asayama et al[13]
Our study
Number of the patient, n13732
Median age (yr), (range)6762 (NA)66 (56-72)72 (65-76)62.5 (47-78)
Gender (male:female)NA3:06:13:00:2
Median interval from surgery to RIC (mo), (range)NA7 (5-12)11 (5-44)21 (9-29)3.5 (3-4)
AS locationRRRT, S, SR
Temporary stoma at time of RIC, n113NA1
Treatment naive AS, n10022
Previous treatment of RIC, nNone371None
Bougie dilatationNA50
Endoscopic balloon dilatationNA21
Endoscopic RIC with single session, n12422
Mean number of RIC sessions11.32.32.71
Median procedure time (min), (range)1269.5 (35-82)18 (7-34)22 (15-25)16 (12-20)
Major complicationNoneNoneNoneNoneNone
Median post-procedural hospital stay (d), (range)NA3.5 (3-4)3 (2-5)4 (2-5)2.5 (2-3)
Median follow-up after RIC (mo), (range)817 (3-33)27 (18-55)25 (5-34)21.5 (20-23)
Treatment after restenosis, n01210
Treatment failure, n00200