Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Diabetes. Sep 15, 2023; 14(9): 1385-1392
Published online Sep 15, 2023. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v14.i9.1385
Table 1 Clinical data
Factors
Dialysis group (n = 45)
Joint group (n = 49)
χ2 value
P value
Age (yr)2.0420.153
> 602520
≤ 602029
Gender0.6410.423
Male2228
Female2321
BMI (kg/m2)0.3000.583
> 25 1519
≤ 253030
Course of renal decompensation (yr)0.5260.468
> 22935
≤ 21614
History of hypertension0.5120.474
Yes1210
No3339
History of hyperlipidemia0.5660.451
Yes86
No3743
History of smoking0.6410.423
Yes2228
No2321
History of alcoholism0.2220.637
Yes65
No3944
Table 2 Efficacy evaluation, n (%)
Group
Markedly effective
Effective
Ineffective
Total effective rate
Dialysis group (n = 45)25 (55.56)8 (17.78)12 (26.66)33 (73.34)
Joint group (n = 49)33 (67.35)12 (24.48)4 (8.16)45 (91.84)
χ2 value5.686
P value0.017
Table 3 Adverse reactions, n (%)
Group
Nausea and vomiting
Loss of appetite
Phlebitis
Gastrointestinal reaction
Rash
Total incidence rate
Dialysis group (n = 45)2 (4.44)2 (4.44)1 (2.22)2 (4.44)1 (2.22)8 (17.78)
Joint group (n = 49)1 (2.04)1 (2.04)2 (4.08)1 (2.04)1 (2.04)6 (12.24)
χ2 value0.566
P value0.451