Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Diabetes. May 15, 2017; 8(5): 222-229
Published online May 15, 2017. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v8.i5.222
Published online May 15, 2017. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v8.i5.222
Albuminuria categories [albumin/creatinine (mg/mmol)] | ||||
A1 | A2 | A3 | ||
< 3 | 3-30 | ≥ 30 | ||
Normal to mildly increased | Moderately increased | Severely increased | ||
eGFR categories (mL/min per 1.73 m2) | G1, ≥ 90 | Low risk | Moderately increased risk | High risk |
Normal/high | ||||
G2, 60-90 | Low risk | Moderately increased risk | High risk | |
Mildly decreased | ||||
G3a, 45-59 | Moderately increased risk | High risk | Very high risk | |
Mildly to moderately decreased | ||||
G3b, 30-44 | High risk | Very high risk | Very high risk | |
Moderately to severely decreased | ||||
G4, 15-29 | Very high risk | Very high risk | Very high risk | |
Severely decreased | ||||
G5, < 15 | Very high risk | Very high risk | Very high risk | |
Kidney failure |
- Citation: Lovrenčić MV, Biljak VR, Blaslov K, Božičević S, Duvnjak LS. Impact of creatinine methodology on glomerular filtration rate estimation in diabetes. World J Diabetes 2017; 8(5): 222-229
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v8/i5/222.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v8.i5.222