Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Diabetes. Dec 15, 2016; 7(20): 599-604
Published online Dec 15, 2016. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v7.i20.599
Published online Dec 15, 2016. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v7.i20.599
Advantages |
Relatively easy and non-painful administration |
Flexible timing of administration either inhaled directly before meals or within 20 min after finishing a meal[10] |
Hypoglycemia is less frequent than subcutaneous insulin, particularly late postprandial hypoglycemia |
Weight gain is slightly less pronounced than subcutaneous insulin |
Limitations |
Frequent cough (24%-33% of patients) |
Available only as prandial short-acting insulin. Hence, long-acting basal subcutaneous insulin should be added in patients with type 1 diabetes |
Slightly less effective than subcutaneous insulin |
Need for baseline and then serial pulmonary function testing |
Safer to switch to subcutaneous insulin in case of upper or lower respiratory infections to avoid exacerbation of the disease and possible unreliable pulmonary absorption |
No data available for pediatric and pregnant populations |
Limited strength options and difficult fine titration of doses |
Lack of long-term safety data |
High cost, e.g., average price of ninety 4-unit cartridges and 2 inhalers is $271[21] |
- Citation: Mikhail N. Place of technosphere inhaled insulin in treatment of diabetes. World J Diabetes 2016; 7(20): 599-604
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v7/i20/599.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v7.i20.599