Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Diabetes. Dec 15, 2016; 7(20): 599-604
Published online Dec 15, 2016. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v7.i20.599
Table 2 Clinical trials of technosphere insulin using the Med-Tone device
Ref.Raskin et al[14]Rosensensk et al[12]
DesignRandomized, open label, 2 yr-duration, pulmonary safety trialRandomized, open-label, 52-wk duration
Type of diabetesTypes 1 and 2Type 2
Groups of subjects and interventionTI (n = 938), usual diabetes care (n = 951), control subjects without diabetes (n = 164)Glargine qhs + prandial TI (n = 334) vs1biaspart insulin bid (n = 343)
Proportions of patients with adverse effects79% TI vs 71% usual care84% TI vs 89% biaspart
Mean HbA1c at baseline8.7%8.7%
Reduction in HbA1c vs baseline-0.59% with TI and -0.50% with usual care-0.68% with TI/glargine vs -0.76% with biaspart
Reduction in HbA1c with TI vs comparator0.09% (not significant)0.07% (not significant)
Proportions of patients reporting hypoglycemia39.5% TI vs 39.1% usual care48% glargine/TI vs 69% biaspart. OR 0.4 (95%CI: 0.3-0.5)
Proportions of patients reporting cough27.8% TI vs 4.4% usual care33% glargine/TI vs 6% biaspart
Withdrawal due to cough4.7% TI vs 0% usual care2% glargine/TI vs 0% biaspart
Change in mean weightNot reported+ 0.9 kg glargine/TI vs +2.5 kg biaspart. Mean difference 1.6 kg (95%CI: -2.4 to -0.7)
Decline in mean FEV1 (liters)More decline in TI group vs usual care. Mean difference 0.037 (95%CI: 0.017-0.06)-0.13 glargine/TI vs -0.09 biaspart (difference not significant)
Withdrawal due to adverse effects11% TI vs 0.6% usual care9% glargine/TI vs 4% biaspart