Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Diabetes. Dec 15, 2016; 7(20): 599-604
Published online Dec 15, 2016. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v7.i20.599
Published online Dec 15, 2016. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v7.i20.599
Table 2 Clinical trials of technosphere insulin using the Med-Tone device
Ref. | Raskin et al[14] | Rosensensk et al[12] |
Design | Randomized, open label, 2 yr-duration, pulmonary safety trial | Randomized, open-label, 52-wk duration |
Type of diabetes | Types 1 and 2 | Type 2 |
Groups of subjects and intervention | TI (n = 938), usual diabetes care (n = 951), control subjects without diabetes (n = 164) | Glargine qhs + prandial TI (n = 334) vs1biaspart insulin bid (n = 343) |
Proportions of patients with adverse effects | 79% TI vs 71% usual care | 84% TI vs 89% biaspart |
Mean HbA1c at baseline | 8.7% | 8.7% |
Reduction in HbA1c vs baseline | -0.59% with TI and -0.50% with usual care | -0.68% with TI/glargine vs -0.76% with biaspart |
Reduction in HbA1c with TI vs comparator | 0.09% (not significant) | 0.07% (not significant) |
Proportions of patients reporting hypoglycemia | 39.5% TI vs 39.1% usual care | 48% glargine/TI vs 69% biaspart. OR 0.4 (95%CI: 0.3-0.5) |
Proportions of patients reporting cough | 27.8% TI vs 4.4% usual care | 33% glargine/TI vs 6% biaspart |
Withdrawal due to cough | 4.7% TI vs 0% usual care | 2% glargine/TI vs 0% biaspart |
Change in mean weight | Not reported | + 0.9 kg glargine/TI vs +2.5 kg biaspart. Mean difference 1.6 kg (95%CI: -2.4 to -0.7) |
Decline in mean FEV1 (liters) | More decline in TI group vs usual care. Mean difference 0.037 (95%CI: 0.017-0.06) | -0.13 glargine/TI vs -0.09 biaspart (difference not significant) |
Withdrawal due to adverse effects | 11% TI vs 0.6% usual care | 9% glargine/TI vs 4% biaspart |
- Citation: Mikhail N. Place of technosphere inhaled insulin in treatment of diabetes. World J Diabetes 2016; 7(20): 599-604
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v7/i20/599.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v7.i20.599