Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Diabetes. Aug 25, 2015; 6(10): 1132-1151
Published online Aug 25, 2015. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i10.1132
Table 3 Modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors associated with new-onset diabetes after transplantation or dysglycemic state
VariableRef.Comment
ATG-divided doseStevens et al[48]Increased dysglycemia compared to single dose in patients treated with Tac and sirolimus
African AmericanKasiske et al[49] Shah et al[50] Johnston et al[51] Bayer et al[9]OR = 1.68 RR = 1.38 HR = 1.56 HR = 1.35
AgeKasiske et al[49]Strong independent risk factor
RR: 1.9-2.6
Cole et al[52]27707 registry patients OR: 1.33
If > 60 yr
Ghisdal et al[53]OR 1.03 of NODAT for each
6 mo of age
Luan et al[8]Increasing age associated with dysglycemia and new onset metabolic syndrome
Luan et al[46]Analysis of 25837 registry patients, increase in NODAT in each categorised group compared to reference 18-34 years old
Israni et al[13]HR: 1.33 of NODAT at 60 mo
Tillmann et al[17]Increase in dysglycemia at mean of 56 M post-transplant; RR of 1.28 for each 5 yr
Mccaughan et al[54]OR 1.4 per decade in 427 Northern Irish patients
Schweer et al[26]NODAT 56.1 yr vs 47.9 yr; P < 0.01
APCKDde Mattos et al[55]Increased 1 yr incidence in a matched cohort
Hamer et al[56]Multivariate analysis OR 2.4
Johnston et al[51]No increase found in 21564 USRDS patients
Luan et al[46]Multivariate analysis OR: 1.17
Ruderman et al[57]No increased risk found
BasiliximabAasebø et al[58]Basilixmab (n = 134) vs no induction historical control; increased dysglycemic state P = 0.017
Prasad et al[27]In living recipients who elected to receive basiliximab OR 2.34 for NODAT at 3 mo
BMIKasiske et al[49]Increased BMI, NODAT RR: 1.7
Cole et al[52]Multivariate analysis OR 1.76 for NODAT
Luan et al[46]Analysis of 25837 registry patients. increase in NODAT in each categorised group of BMI compared to reference < 20
Israni et al[13]BMI ≥ 30, HR 1.69 for NODAT at 60 mo
CMVHjelmesaeth et al[59]Asymptomatic infection OR: 4.0 for NODAT at 10 wk
CNI –Chan et al[15]NODAT 17% vs 31%, low dose vs standard dose Tac
Higher levelsCole et al[19]Single arm study of 49 patients with a 4% 6 mo incidence of NODAT. Early glucocorticoid reduction and low dose CsA
Suszynski et al[60]Higher Tac levels (plus sirolimus) compared to lower Tac (plus sirolimus) or CsA/MMF higher rates of NODAT with 10 yr FU
CNI –Vincenti et al[5]RCT. Dysglycemia at 6 mo higher in Tac/MMF vs CsA/MMF: P = 0.05
Tac vs CsACole et al[52]27707 registry patients OR 1.51 for NODAT
Luan et al[46]Analysis of 25837 registry patients. Increase in NODAT OR: 1.24
Vacher-Coponat et al[16]No difference in CsA/Aza vs Tac/MMF in RCT (n = 289)
Cotovio et al[44]Retrospective multivariate analysis higher Tac not CsA levels associated with NODAT
Family history of diabetesBora et al[61]Recipients from living related donors
Santos et al[62]Retrospective (n = 303). RR: 3.6 for NODAT
GenderKasiske et al[49]Greater risk in males in registry patients
McCaughan et al[54]OR 2.2 for male gender in 427 Northern Irish patients
Genetic polymorphismsGhisdal et al[53]rs7903146 polymorphism of TCF7L2 OR 1.6 of NODAT at 6 mol/L, but not associated with IGT
Ghisdal et al[63]Summarises known associations
Kurzawski et al[64]Polish Caucasian patients. Increasing SNPs associated with increased risk, OR = 1.37
Yao et al[65]Fok1 vitamin D polymorphism associated with NODAT OR 11.8 P = 0.012
McCaughan et al[54]7 SNPs involved with β-cell apoptosis associated with NODAT
Nicoletto et al[66]Adiponectin gene polymorphism associated with NODAT
Tavira et al[67]Mitochondrial haplogroup H associated with NODAT in Tac treated patients
GlucocorticoidsBoots et al[68]Early glucocorticoid withdrawal associated with reduced NODAT incidence in the first year
Ghisdal et al[53]OR 2.78 of NODAT at 6 mol/L if AR treated with glucocorticoids
Luan et al[46]Analysis of 25837 registry patients. OR 1.42 for NODAT if discharged on maintenance. Glucocorticoid only induction associated with increase in NODAT OR: 1.31
Rizzari et al[69]Significant reduction in NODAT compared with historical control when glucocorticoids rapidly tapered
Cole et al[19]Single arm study of 49 patients with a 4% 6 mo incidence of NODAT. Early glucocorticoid reduction and low dose CsA
Schweer et al[26]Pulse glucocorticoid for BPAR associated with increasing NODAT incidence
HCV +Kasiske et al[49]HCV+, NODAT RR: 1.3
Cole et al[52]27707 registry patients OR for NODAT 1.82
Johnston et al[51]21564 USRDS registry patients, HR: 1.7 for NODAT
Baid-Agrawal et al[70]14 HCV+ 24 HCV- patients. HCV+ increased insulin resistance; P = 0.008
Luan et al[46]Analysis of 25837 registry patients. Increase in NODAT OR: 1.43
Lv et al[29]Cohort of 428 Chinese patients. NODAT associated with HCV at mean 5.6 yr follow up, OR = 2.72
Prasad et al[27]439 Indian patients, OR = 6.37
Hyper-parathyroidism post transplantIvarsson et al[71]PTH > 13.8 pmol/L associated with NODAT at 1 yr, OR = 4.25
Impaired glycemic state pre-transplantRamesh Prasad et al[7]Higher within the normal range random BSL associated with NODAT
Bora et al[61]IGT at time of transplant associated with NODAT
Hornum et al[33]IGT NOT predictive of NODAT
Cotovio et al[44]Higher fasting BGL associated with NODAT
Magnesium post-transplantGarg et al[72]1 mol/L lower Mg associated with dysglycemia; no association with 1M CNI trough level
Magnesium pre-transplantAugusto et al[73]Lower magnesium immediately pre-transplant associated with NODAT; P < 0.02
Metabolic syndrome post-transplantIsrani et al[13]MS in first 6-12 mo associated with NODAT by 60 mo, HR = 3.46
Luan et al[8]10 W dysglycemia associated with MS
Nagaraja et al[22]Development of MS predicts progressive dysglycemia
Metabolic syndrome pre-transplantBayer et al[9]HR: 1.34 for NODAT at 1 yr
SirolimusTeutonico et al[74]No improvement when changing from CNI to sirolimus
Ekberg et al[75]Low dose sirolimus may confer less risk than low dose Tac
Johnston et al[51]20124 registry patients. Compared to CsA + MMF/AZA: Sirolimus + CsA HR 1.61; Sirolimus + Tac HR 1.66; Sirolimus + MMF/AZA HR 1.36
Guerra et al[76]RCT (n = 150) Tac/sirolimus vs Tac/MMF vs CsA/sirolimus. No difference in NODAT
Gyurus et al[77]Retrospective (n = 514). Sirolimus HR 3.5 for NODAT over 10 yr
Veroux et al[78]21 NODAT converted to sirolimus, 80% remission of NODAT on basis of F BGL
Suszynski et al[60]Increased risk with high dose Tac/low dose sirolimus combination