Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Diabetes. Jun 15, 2014; 5(3): 399-406
Published online Jun 15, 2014. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v5.i3.399
Published online Jun 15, 2014. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v5.i3.399
References/trial name (n = sample size) | Study population and duration of the study | Study drugs | Change in HbA1c from the baseline (in percent) | Change in FBG from baseline | Change in body weight from baseline | Other parameters (least square mean change) |
Stenlöf et al[19] (n = 584) | T2DM patients on diet and exercise with inadequate glycemic control Duration of the study = 26 wk | CFZ = 100 mg/300 mg OD vs PL | -0.77% to -1.03% (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg, P < 0.001 vs PL) | -27 mg/dL to -35 mg/dL (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg, P < 0.001 vs PL) | % Body weight reduction -2.8% to -3.9% (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg, P < 0.001 vs PL) | ΔPPBG = -43 to -59 mg/dL (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg) ΔSBP = -3.3 to -5.0 mmHg (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg, P < 0.001 vs PL) ΔDBP = -1.7 to -2.1 mmHg (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg vs PL) ΔHDL = CFZ 100 mg = 11.2% (P < 0.001 vs PL) CFZ 300 mg = 10.6% (P < 0.01 vs PL) ΔLDL = 2.9% to 7.1% (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg vs PL) ΔTG = 2.5% to -2.3% (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg vs PL) HOMA-%B = 9.9% to 20.3% (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg vs PL) |
CANTATA-D[20] | 26-wk extension study | At the end of 26 wk | At the end of 26 wk | At the end of 26 wk | At the end of 26 wk | |
(n = 1284) | T2DM patients with inadequate glycemic control on protocol specified MET-IR monotherapy with HbA1c: 7.0% to 10.5%, FBG < 270 mg/dL | CFZ = 100 mg/300 mg OD + MET-IR vs PL + MET-IR for first 26 wk | -0.79% to -0.94% (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg, P < 0.001 vs PL) | -27.3 mg/dL to -37.8 mg/dL (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg, P < 0.001 vs PL) | % Body weight reduction -3.7% to -4.2% (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg, P < 0.001 vs PL) | ΔPPBG = -47.9 mg/dL to -57.1 mg/dL (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg, P < 0.001 vs PL) SITA = -49.3 mg/dL ΔSBP = -3.84 mmHg to -5.06 mmHg (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg, P < 0.001 vs PL), SITA = -1.83 mmHg ΔTG = CFZ 100 mg = 1.6%, P = 0.7 vs PL, CFZ 300 mg = -1.4%, P = 0.2 vs PL, SITA = 1.0% ΔHDL = 10.4% to 12.1% (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg, P < 0.001 vs PL), SITA = 5% |
CFZ = 100 mg/300 mg OD + MET-IR vs SITA 100 mg + MET-IR for next 26 wk | SITA = -0.82% | SITA = -20.2 mg/dL | SITA = -1.2% | |||
At the end of 52 wk | At the end of 52 wk | At the end of 52 wk | At the end of 52 wk | |||
-0.73% to -0.88% (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg) | -26.2 mg/dL to -35.2 mg/dL (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg, P < 0.001 vs SITA) | -3.8% to -4.2% (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg, P < 0.001 vs SITA) | ΔSBP = -3.53 mmHg to -4.65 mmHg (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg, P < 0.001 vs SITA) SITA = -0.66 mmHg ΔTG = CFZ 100 mg = 1.9%, P = 0.46 vs SITA CFZ 300 mg = 2.7%, P = 0.32 vs SITA SITA = -0.4% ΔHDL = 11.2% to 13.3% (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg, P < 0.001 vs SITA), SITA = 6.0% | |||
SITA = -0.73% | SITA = -17.7 mg/dL | SITA = -1.3% | ||||
Guthrie et al[21] | 26-wk extension study | At the end of 26 wk | At the end of 26 wk | At the end of 26 wk | At the end of 26 wk | |
Forst et al[22] CANTATA-MP (n = 344) | T2DM patients currently treated with PPAR gamma agent (PIO or ROSI) and MET with HbA1c: 7%-10.5% and FBG < 270 mg/dL | CFZ = 100 mg/300 mg OD + MET + PIO vs PL + MET + PIO for first 26 wk CFZ = 100 mg/300 mg OD + MET + PIO vs SITA 100 mg + MET + PIO for next 26 wk | -0.89% to -1.03% (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg, P < 0.001 vs PL) | -26.8 mg/dL to -33.2 mg/dL (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg, P < 0.001 vs PL) | -2.8% to -3.8% (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg, P < 0.001 vs PL) | ΔSBP = CFZ 100 mg = -5.30 mmHg (P = 0.005 vs PL) CFZ 300 mg = -4.70 mmHg (P = 0.016 vs PL) ΔTG = CFZ 100 mg = 3.2% (P = 0.034 vs PL) CFZ 300 mg = -1.7% (P = 0.003 vs PL) ΔHDL = CFZ 100 mg = 7.2% (P = 0.01 vs PL) CFZ 300 mg = 8.9% (P < 0.001 vs PL) HOMA-%B = 15.19% to 18.14% (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg, P < 0.01 vs PL) |
At the end of 52 wk | At the end of 52 wk | At the end of 52 wk | At the end of 52 wk | |||
-0.92% to -1.03% (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg) | -26.7 mg/dL to -31.5 mg/dL (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg) | -2.7% to -3.7% (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg) | ΔSBP = -3.4 to -3.7 mmHg (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg) ΔDBP = -2.5 to -2.7 mmHg (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg) ΔHDL = CFZ 100 mg = 7.0% CFZ 300 mg = 11.4% ΔLDL = 10.9% to 14.3% (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg) ΔTG = 4.7% to -0.6% (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg) | |||
Cefalu et al[23] CANTATA-SU (n = 1450) | T2DM patients with HbA1c: 7%-9.5% on stable MET therapy ≥ 1500 mg/d, BMI = 22-45kg/m2, FBG ≤ 270mg/dL Duration of the study = 52 wk | CFZ = 100 mg/300mg OD + MET vs GLIM 6 mg/8 mg OD + MET | -0.82% to -0.93% (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg) | -1.35 mmol/L to -1.52 mmol/L (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg) | -4.2% to -4.7% (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg, P < 0.001 vs GLIM) | ΔSBP = -3.3 to -4.6 mmHg (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg) GLIM = 0.2 mmHg ΔDBP = -1.8 to -2.5 mmHg (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg) GLIM = -0.1 mmHg ΔTG = CFZ 100 mg = -3.7% CFZ 300 mg = 2.3% GLIM = 9.5% ΔHDL = CFZ 100 mg = 7.9% CFZ 300 mg = 9.0% GLIM = 0.3% ΔLDL = 9.6% to 14.1% (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg) GLIM = 5% |
GLIM = -0.81% | GLIM = -1.02 mmol/L | GLIM = 1% | ||||
Wilding et al[24] | 26-wk extension study | At the end of 26 wk | At the end of 26 wk | At the end of 26 wk | At the end of 26 wk | |
CANTATA-MSU (n = 469) | T2DM patients currently treated with MET and SU with HbA1c: 7%-10.5% and FBG < 270 mg/dL | CFZ = 100 mg/300 mg OD + MET + SU vs PL + MET + SU | -0.85% to -1.06% (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg, P < 0.001 vs PL) | -18.2 mg/dL to -30.5 mg/dL (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg, P < 0.001 vs PL) | -2.1% to -2.6% (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg, P < 0.001 vs PL) | ΔSBP = CFZ 100 mg = -4.89 mmHg (P = 0.07 vs PL) CFZ 300 mg = -4.27 mmHg (P = 0.2 vs PL) ΔTG = CFZ 100 mg = 5.4% (P = 0.256 vs PL) CFZ 300 mg = 8.5% (P = 0.57 vs PL) ΔHDL = CFZ 100 mg = 5.7% (P = 0.153 vs PL) CFZ 300 mg = 6.5% (P = 0.056 vs PL) |
Schernthaner et al[25] CANTATA-D2 (n = 755) | T2DM patients currently treated with MET and SU with HbA1c: 7%-10.5% and FBG < 300 mg/dL Duration of the study = 52 wk | CFZ = 300 mg OD + MET + SU vs SITA = 100 mg OD + MET + SU | CFZ 300 mg = -1.03% (P < 0.001 vs SITA) SITA = -0.66% | CFZ 300 mg = -29.9 mg/dL (P < 0.001 vs SITA) SITA = -5.85 mg/dL | CFZ 300 mg = -2.5% (P < 0.001 vs SITA) SITA = 0.3% | ΔSBP = CFZ 300 mg = -5.06 mmHg (P < 0.001 vs SITA) SITA = 0.85 mmHg ΔTG = CFZ 300 mg = 9.6% (P = 0.554 vs SITA) SITA = 11.9% ΔHDL = CFZ 300 mg = 7.6% (P < 0.001 vs SITA) SITA = 0.6% |
Devineni et al[26] (n = 29) | T2DM patients not optimally controlled on insulin and up to one oral AHA with BMI: 25-45 kg/m2, FBG: 3.3-5.5 mmol/L, HbA1c: 7%-10.5% and serum creatinine: < 132.6 mmol/L for males and < 123.8 mmol/L for women Duration of the study = 28 d | CFZ 100 mg OD/300 mg bid + Insulin + upto one AHA vs PL + insulin + upto one AHA | -0.73% to -0.92% (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg) | -2.11 mmol/L to -2.35 mmol/L (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg) | -0.73 kg to -1.19 kg (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg) | ΔUGE = 71.9 g/d to 129.2 g/d |
Rosenstock et al[27] (n = 451) | T2DM patients under stable MET monotherapy (≥ 1500 mg/d) with HbA1c: 7%-10%, BMI: 24-45 kg/m2, serum creatinine: < 1.5mg/dL for males and < 1.4 mg/dL for females Duration of the study = 12 wk | CFZ = 50/100/200/300 mg OD or 300 mg bid + MET vs PL + MET vs SITA 100 mg OD + MET | CFZ 50 mg = -0.79% 100 mg = -0.76% 200 mg = -0.70% 300 mg = -0.92% 300 mg bid = -0.95% SITA = -0.74% | CFZ 50 mg = -16.2 mg/dL 100 mg = -25.2 mg/dL 200 mg = -27.0 mg/dL 300 mg = -25.2 mg/dL 300 mg bid = -3.4 mg/dL SITA = -12.6 mg/dL | CFZ 50 mg = -2.3% 100 mg = -2.60% 200 mg = -2.70% 300 mg = -3.40% 300 mg bid = -3.4% SITA = -0.60% | ΔSBP = -3.3 to -5 mmHg (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg) SITA = -0.8 mmHg ΔDBP = -1.7 to -2.1 mmHg (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg) SITA = -0.6 mmHg ΔTG = CFZ 100 mg = 2.5% CFZ 300 mg = -2.3% ΔHDL = CFZ 100 mg = 11.2% CFZ 300 mg = 10.6% ΔLDL = 2.9% to 7.1% (CFZ 100 mg/300 mg) HOMA-%B = CFZ 50-300 mg OD = 6% to 18% CFZ 300 mg bid = 16% SITA = 10% |
ClinicalTrials. gov identifier: NCT01064414[28] (n = 272) | 26-wk extension study | At the end of 26 wk | At the end of 26 wk | |||
T2DM patients with or without AHA, on regular diet and exercise with moderate renal impairment | CFZ = 100 mg/300 mg OD with or without AHA vs PL with or without AHA | -0.33% to -0.44% (CFZ 100 mg, P = 0.01 vs PL, CFZ 300 mg, P < 0.001 vs PL) | CFZ 100 mg = -14.9 mg/dL, P = 0.02 CFZ 300 mg = -11.7 mg/dL, P = 0.06 | Information was not available | Information was not available |
- Citation: Bhatia J, Gamad N, Bharti S, Arya DS. Canagliflozin-current status in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus with focus on clinical trial data. World J Diabetes 2014; 5(3): 399-406
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v5/i3/399.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v5.i3.399