Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Diabetes. Mar 15, 2025; 16(3): 99277
Published online Mar 15, 2025. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i3.99277
Published online Mar 15, 2025. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i3.99277
Table 2 Comparison of continuous glucose monitoring-derived metrics between the non-diabetic foot and diabetic foot groups
Variables | NDF (n = 294) | DF (n = 297) | P value |
CGM-derived metrics | |||
MBG, mmol/L | 8.23 (7.33-9.81) | 9.20 (8.00-10.70) | < 0.001 |
SD, mmol/L | 2.34 (1.80-2.92) | 2.40 (1.80-3.25) | 0.129 |
CV, % | 26.80 (22.11-32.80) | 26.32 (20.56-33.78) | 0.496 |
LAGE | 11.82 (8.98-14.71) | 11.50 (8.80-15.25) | 0.929 |
GRI | 24.52 (10.21-42.77) | 35.98 (18.87-59.29) | < 0.001 |
TIR, % | 76.90 (58.00-88.73) | 65.91 (43.68-81.95) | < 0.001 |
TAR, % | 20.26 (9.37-41.59) | 32.57 (16.26-55.43) | < 0.001 |
TAR level 1, % | 17.03 (8.44-31.71) | 25.35 (13.56-38.90) | < 0.001 |
TAR level 2, % | 2.81 (0.00-8.60) | 5.04 (0.00-14.97) | < 0.001 |
TBR, % | 0.00 (0.00-1.24) | 0.00 (0.00-0.69) | 0.114 |
TBR level 1, % | 0.00 (0.00-1.08) | 0.00 (0.00-0.62) | 0.197 |
TBR level 2, % | 0.00 (0.00-0.00) | 0.00 (0.00-0.00) | 0.031 |
CGM-derived indicator achievement, n (%) | |||
CV target | 250 (85.03) | 240 (80.81) | 0.172 |
TIR target | 180 (61.22) | 128 (43.10) | < 0.001 |
TAR level 1 target | 196 (66.67) | 146 (49.16) | < 0.001 |
TAR level 2 target | 182 (61.90) | 148 (49.83) | 0.003 |
TBR level 1 target | 262 (89.12) | 269 (90.57) | 0.558 |
TBR level 2 target | 279 (94.90) | 284 (95.62) | 0.678 |
- Citation: Geng XQ, Chen SF, Wang FY, Yang HJ, Zhao YL, Xu ZR, Yang Y. Correlation between key indicators of continuous glucose monitoring and the risk of diabetic foot. World J Diabetes 2025; 16(3): 99277
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v16/i3/99277.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v16.i3.99277