Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Diabetes. Mar 15, 2025; 16(3): 100329
Published online Mar 15, 2025. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i3.100329
Table 5 Representation of techniques used for early diagnosis of diabetic foot ulcers
Techniques/tools
Assessment
Procedure
Utilization
Conventional toolsDirect physical examinationHelp provide an assessment of the healing status of the wound
Footwear connected to computerPressure perceptionAnalyze risk factors for DFU based on recorded foot pressureUse of footwear is considered good for identifying ulcerations, because there is a walking practice carried out by the patient
Biothesiometer or tuning forkVibration perception threshold testingVibration perception is tested over the pulp of the halluxPatients who are at risk of DFU will feel relatively shorter vibration than normal people
Sudoscan medical deviceSudomotor/sweat glands functionConsist of a set of two electrodes for the feet and hands connected to a computerBased on stimulation of sweat glands by low level voltage allowing evidence of sweat dysfunction that is not detectable under physiological conditions
PinpricksInserted into pain receptors, namely the Meissner and Pacini nerves in the legsSimple and can identify the risk of DFU well. Inability to perceive pinprick over either hallux would be regarded as an abnormal test result
3D thermal camera assessment system (e.g., FLIR or DSLR camera integrated smartphones)Temperature perceptionHelps in detecting the increase in temperature over the point of sole susceptible for ulcerHelp in taking preventive measures and stop further progression of disease. This is important to accelerate healing
DFU screening instrument; questionnaire/images, e.g., NeuDiaCanMotor/sensitivity/autonomic, color segmentation of imagesAllows the examination to be completed with an objective scoreHelp stratify the risk of diabetic foot and can be combined with standard nursing interventions