Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Diabetes. May 15, 2024; 15(5): 828-852
Published online May 15, 2024. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v15.i5.828
Table 3 Studies comparing premixed and basal-bolus regimens in term of patient-reported outcomes
ResultType of insulin
therapy
Study designPROMsCommentRef.
Favor basal bolus therapyGlargine + glulisine (BB) vs lispromix or aspartmix (PM)Comparative 12 wk intervention (crossover) phasesValidated generic and diabetes-specific modules of treatment satisfaction and QOLThe basal-bolus insulin regimen showed better outcomes in terms of treatment satisfaction and quality of life scores compared to premixed insulin regimens[203]
Premixed vs basal bolus6 months observational prospective studyEQ-5D-3LBasal-bolus regimen showed the most significant potential to increase HRQOL in comparison to other regimens[204]
Glargine + glulisine (BB) vs aspartmix (PM)BB vs PM after 24 wk of treatmentDTSQ; ITSQ; ADDQOL; EQ-5DThe basal-bolus group showed significantly higher overall satisfaction with treatment, satisfaction with insulin, perceived frequency of hyperglycemia, and overall present quality of life[137]
Glargine + glulisine (BB) vs aspartmix (PM)Baseline vs 60 wk follow upPAIS-SR; EQ-5D; HFS; DQOLThe basal-bolus regimen showed superior outcomes compared to the premixed group in terms of QOL. The basal-bolus group experienced significant improvements in psychological adjustment to illness and less fear of hypoglycemia. The premixed group reported significant increases in hypoglycemic worry and a significant decline in general health related QOL[205]
Glargine + lispro (BB) vs lispromix (PM)Baseline vs 24 wk follow upDTSQ; EWITQNo significant difference between the two groups in term of DTSQ and EWITQ scores except that premixed group showed significantly higher perceived frequency of hypoglycemia than basal-bolus group[138]
Favor Premixed therapyGlargine or NPH based BB regimen vs aspartmix (PM)24 wk prospective study after switching to AspartMixEQ-5DSwitching to AspartMix showed significant improvement in HRQOL[206]
Glargine + glulisine (BB) vs aspartmix (PM)26 months randomized trialEQ-5D; DQOL; WPAINo significant difference of different scales for three questionnaires between two groups except for work missed for health which is significantly lower in BB group[128]
NPH + lispro (BB) vs lispromix (PM)12 wk randomized comparative trialITR-QOLThe premixed group exhibited significantly higher scores in the total score and daily activities subscale score of ITR-QOL compared to the basal-bolus group[207]
Undetectable differenceGlargine + glulisine (BB) vs lispromix or aspartmix (PM)Patients switched from PM to BB with follow up for 16 wkDTSQNo significant difference in treatment satisfaction between two groups[139]
Detemir + aspart (BB) vs aspartmix (PM)Baseline vs 50 wk of treatmentSF-36; DiabMedSat; DPM; TRIM-DNo statistically significant differences between premixed and basal-bolus group in term of patients’ satisfaction, productivity and quality of life[130]
Premixed vs basal bolusBaseline vs 6 months Switching to basal bolus regimenDQOLNo significant difference in satisfaction, impact of diabetes, social concern and concern related to diabetes after initiation of basal-bolus regimen[101]
Glargine + lispro (BB) vs lispromix (PM)48 wk open label randomized studyEQ-5D; DHP-18No significant difference of different scales for two questionnaires between two groups[208]
Glargine + lispro (BB) vs lispromix (PM)Baseline vs 24 wk follow upITSQ; PAM-D21No significant difference between the two groups in terms of ITSQ domain and total scores, and PAM-D21 questionnaires domain scores[132]
Glargine + lispro (BB) vs lispromix (PM)Baseline vs 48 wk follow upEQ-5D; DTSQNo significant difference between the two groups[140]
Glargine + glulisine (BB) vs aspartmix (PM)Baseline vs 24 wk follow upDTSQNo significant difference between the two groups in term of treatment satisfaction[141]