Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Diabetes. May 15, 2024; 15(5): 828-852
Published online May 15, 2024. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v15.i5.828
Published online May 15, 2024. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v15.i5.828
Result | Type of insulin therapy | Study design | PROMs | Comment | Ref. |
Favor basal bolus therapy | Glargine + glulisine (BB) vs lispromix or aspartmix (PM) | Comparative 12 wk intervention (crossover) phases | Validated generic and diabetes-specific modules of treatment satisfaction and QOL | The basal-bolus insulin regimen showed better outcomes in terms of treatment satisfaction and quality of life scores compared to premixed insulin regimens | [203] |
Premixed vs basal bolus | 6 months observational prospective study | EQ-5D-3L | Basal-bolus regimen showed the most significant potential to increase HRQOL in comparison to other regimens | [204] | |
Glargine + glulisine (BB) vs aspartmix (PM) | BB vs PM after 24 wk of treatment | DTSQ; ITSQ; ADDQOL; EQ-5D | The basal-bolus group showed significantly higher overall satisfaction with treatment, satisfaction with insulin, perceived frequency of hyperglycemia, and overall present quality of life | [137] | |
Glargine + glulisine (BB) vs aspartmix (PM) | Baseline vs 60 wk follow up | PAIS-SR; EQ-5D; HFS; DQOL | The basal-bolus regimen showed superior outcomes compared to the premixed group in terms of QOL. The basal-bolus group experienced significant improvements in psychological adjustment to illness and less fear of hypoglycemia. The premixed group reported significant increases in hypoglycemic worry and a significant decline in general health related QOL | [205] | |
Glargine + lispro (BB) vs lispromix (PM) | Baseline vs 24 wk follow up | DTSQ; EWITQ | No significant difference between the two groups in term of DTSQ and EWITQ scores except that premixed group showed significantly higher perceived frequency of hypoglycemia than basal-bolus group | [138] | |
Favor Premixed therapy | Glargine or NPH based BB regimen vs aspartmix (PM) | 24 wk prospective study after switching to AspartMix | EQ-5D | Switching to AspartMix showed significant improvement in HRQOL | [206] |
Glargine + glulisine (BB) vs aspartmix (PM) | 26 months randomized trial | EQ-5D; DQOL; WPAI | No significant difference of different scales for three questionnaires between two groups except for work missed for health which is significantly lower in BB group | [128] | |
NPH + lispro (BB) vs lispromix (PM) | 12 wk randomized comparative trial | ITR-QOL | The premixed group exhibited significantly higher scores in the total score and daily activities subscale score of ITR-QOL compared to the basal-bolus group | [207] | |
Undetectable difference | Glargine + glulisine (BB) vs lispromix or aspartmix (PM) | Patients switched from PM to BB with follow up for 16 wk | DTSQ | No significant difference in treatment satisfaction between two groups | [139] |
Detemir + aspart (BB) vs aspartmix (PM) | Baseline vs 50 wk of treatment | SF-36; DiabMedSat; DPM; TRIM-D | No statistically significant differences between premixed and basal-bolus group in term of patients’ satisfaction, productivity and quality of life | [130] | |
Premixed vs basal bolus | Baseline vs 6 months Switching to basal bolus regimen | DQOL | No significant difference in satisfaction, impact of diabetes, social concern and concern related to diabetes after initiation of basal-bolus regimen | [101] | |
Glargine + lispro (BB) vs lispromix (PM) | 48 wk open label randomized study | EQ-5D; DHP-18 | No significant difference of different scales for two questionnaires between two groups | [208] | |
Glargine + lispro (BB) vs lispromix (PM) | Baseline vs 24 wk follow up | ITSQ; PAM-D21 | No significant difference between the two groups in terms of ITSQ domain and total scores, and PAM-D21 questionnaires domain scores | [132] | |
Glargine + lispro (BB) vs lispromix (PM) | Baseline vs 48 wk follow up | EQ-5D; DTSQ | No significant difference between the two groups | [140] | |
Glargine + glulisine (BB) vs aspartmix (PM) | Baseline vs 24 wk follow up | DTSQ | No significant difference between the two groups in term of treatment satisfaction | [141] |
- Citation: Emad-Eldin M, Balata GF, Elshorbagy EA, Hamed MS, Attia MS. Insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: Insights into clinical efficacy, patient-reported outcomes, and adherence challenges. World J Diabetes 2024; 15(5): 828-852
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v15/i5/828.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v15.i5.828