Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Diabetes. Oct 15, 2024; 15(10): 2135-2146
Published online Oct 15, 2024. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v15.i10.2135
Table 1 Study-level characteristics of included major cardiovascular outcome trials and associated post-hoc analyses
Year
CVOT
Intervention
Median follow-up (year)
History of MI (yes, %)
History of HF (yes, %)
Post-baseline GLP-1RA/SGLT-2I (yes, %), intervention/placebo
2013EXAMINE[25]Alogliptin1.5N/AN/AN/A
2013SAVOR-TIMI 53[26]Saxagliptin2.1N/AN/AN/A
2015TECOS[27]Sitagliptin3.0N/AN/AN/A
2019
2015
CARMELINA[28]
ELIXA[29]
Linagliptin
Lixisenatide
2.2
2.1
N/A
22
N/A
22
N/A
N/A
2016SUSTAIN-6[30]Semaglutide2.13217[31]1.5/1.2
2016LEADER[32]Liraglutide3.83118[33]2.1/2.81
2017EXSCEL[34]Exenatide3.232[35]164.4/5.8
2018HARMONY OUTCOMES[36]Albiglutide1.547209.7/10.8
2019REWIND[37]Dulaglutide5.416[38]95.2/7.3
2019PIONEER-6[39]Semaglutide1.336[31]12[31]13.5/15.8
2021AMPLITUDE-O[40]Efpeglenatide1.8N/A1817.5/21.2
2015EMPA-REG OUTCOME[41]Empagliflozin3.14710N/A
2017CANVAS[42]Canagliflozin2.429[43]146.2/7.72
2019DECLARE-TIMI 58[44]Dapagliflozin4.221[45]109.5/11.5[19]
2019CREDENCE[46]Canagliflozin2.610[47]156.5/6.9
2020VERTIS CV[48]Ertugliflozin3.548244.9/5.6