Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Diabetes. May 15, 2023; 14(5): 528-538
Published online May 15, 2023. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v14.i5.528
Published online May 15, 2023. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v14.i5.528
Table 3 Advantages and disadvantages of continuous glucose monitoring
Advantages | Disadvantages |
Real-time interstitial glucose | Lag time of 15 min from blood glucose, in transdermal and subcutaneous devices (Caution if levels are fluctuating rapidly) |
Deviation from arterial blood glucose is less than 20% | Direct vascular sampling continuous monitoring devices are still evolving |
Provides long-term day-to-week blood glucose levels | Frequent calibration (2-3 times per day) |
Reduced hypoglycaemic events | Biosensors have limited life (around 7 d) |
Less labour intensive | Limited glycaemic range 40-400 mg/dL |
Can reduce contact of care-givers reducing cross infections and risk to care-givers | Evolving clinical evidence (especially in critically ill patients) |
Invasive device, risk of infection when using intravenous devices |
- Citation: Juneja D, Deepak D, Nasa P. What, why and how to monitor blood glucose in critically ill patients. World J Diabetes 2023; 14(5): 528-538
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v14/i5/528.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v14.i5.528