Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Diabetes. Feb 15, 2023; 14(2): 92-109
Published online Feb 15, 2023. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v14.i2.92
Published online Feb 15, 2023. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v14.i2.92
Intervention/ treatment | Study characteristics & benefit(s) of treatment/intervention group | Ref. |
Treatment with antihypertensives acting on renin angiotensin axis | Better executive function, processing speed, verbal memory and composite score compared to those treated with other antihypertensives | Wharton et al[105], 2022 |
Intensive BP and lipid control compared to standard treatment (ACCORD trial) | Intense BP control and lipid reduction had no effects on cognitive decline. Moreover, total brain volume was found to be less with intense BP control (systolic BP < 120 mm Hg) than standard treatment after 40 mo | Williamson et al[107], 2014 |
Liraglutide therapy for T2DM | Activation of different cerebral areas with improved memory, attention, and better scores in all cognitive function tests | Li et al[112], 2021 |
Intense vs standard BP control (SPRINT trial) | Intense BP control was not associated with improvements in memory or processing speed compared to standard BP reduction | Rapp et al[113], 2020 |
10 yr of ILI vs standard care (Look AHEAD trial) | ILI resulted in better odds for emergence of: Decision-making inability (OR = 0.851) and problem solving inability (OR = 0.694) in those without these baseline complaints | Espeland et al[114], 2018 |
Finnish diabetes prevention study | Middle-aged overweight participants with impaired glucose tolerance showed better cognitive performance with low total fat & saturated fat intake, and frequent physical activities compared to standard lifestyle | Lehtisalo et al[115], 2016 |
- Citation: Sebastian MJ, Khan SK, Pappachan JM, Jeeyavudeen MS. Diabetes and cognitive function: An evidence-based current perspective. World J Diabetes 2023; 14(2): 92-109
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v14/i2/92.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v14.i2.92