Case Control Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Diabetes. Dec 15, 2023; 14(12): 1754-1765
Published online Dec 15, 2023. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v14.i12.1754
Table 6 Logistic regression analysis of Nε-carboxymethyl-lysine for risk of diabetic coronary artery disease
Risk model
CML quartile (range) (group I, n; group II, n)
Exp (B)
95%CI (lower-upper)
Significance
Model 1: UnadjustedCML first quartile (83.73-193.18 ng/mL) (group I, n =27; group II, n =23)RefRefRef
CML second quartile (193.19-264.42 ng/mL) (group I, n = 16; group II, n = 34)0.850.48-1.480.57
CML third quartile (264.43-364.31 ng/mL) (group I, n = 23; group II, n = 27)2.121.17-3.850.01
CML fourth quartile (364.32-665.00 ng/mL) (group I, n = 34; group II, n = 16)1.170.67-2.040.57
Model 2: Model 1 + age + sex + non-vegetarian diet + hypertensionCML first quartile (83.73-193.18 ng/mL)RefRefRef
CML second quartile (193.19-264.42 ng/mL)0.570.27-1.230.15
CML third quartile (264.43-364.31 ng/mL)3.051.31-7.060.01
CML fourth quartile (364.32-665.00 ng/mL)1.810.82-3.990.13
Model 3: Model 2+ total cholesterol + triglycerides + LDL-C + IL-6 + TNF-αCML first quartile (83.73-193.18 ng/mL)RefRefRef
CML second quartile (193.19-264.42 ng/mL)0.840.35-2.020.70
CML third quartile (264.43-364.31 ng/mL)3.321.30-8.440.01
CML fourth quartile (364.32-665.00 ng/mL)2.491.03-6.040.04