Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Diabetes. Dec 15, 2022; 13(12): 1106-1121
Published online Dec 15, 2022. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v13.i12.1106
Published online Dec 15, 2022. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v13.i12.1106
Item | Description |
Negative pressure wound therapy (VAC) | Widely used, removal of the excess third space fluid from the area, reduction of bacterial load, increased granulation tissue, but RCTs have high risk of bias |
Synthetic skin grafts (Bio-engineered skin substitutes) | Contribute to the new dermal tissue but limited data to prove benefit of these products |
Non-surgical debridement agents (enzymatic debridement, autolytic debridement, hydroterapy, Maggot therapy) | Promoting fibroblast migration and improving skin perfusion but due to small RCTs, it has clinical bias for beneficial effect |
Topical growth factors (EGF, VEGF, PDGF, FGF) | Promote healing non-infected foot ulcer and stimulating angiogenesis but limited trials confirming positive outcomes |
Electrical stimulation | Bacteriostatic and bactericidal effect on foot ulcer but lack of evidence due to limited clinical trials |
HBOC | HBOC therapy increases blood and oxygen content in hypoxic tissues and has antimicrobial activity, but it is unclear whether it has benefit in long term wound healing |
- Citation: Akkus G, Sert M. Diabetic foot ulcers: A devastating complication of diabetes mellitus continues non-stop in spite of new medical treatment modalities. World J Diabetes 2022; 13(12): 1106-1121
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v13/i12/1106.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v13.i12.1106