Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Diabetes. Sep 15, 2021; 12(9): 1426-1441
Published online Sep 15, 2021. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v12.i9.1426
Table 4 Clinical characteristics of case-control studies reporting dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor-induced bullous pemphigoid
Ref.
Type of the study
Population
Effect of gender
Latency period
Age
Outcome
Plaquevent et al[50], 2019Multicentre case-control studyOut of 1787 patients with BP, 108 subjects were gliptin users. Comparison with a large general population data baseNA14.8 mo (interquartile range 6.0-26.7 mo)77.9 ± 9.3 yrNo difference in outcome between gliptin withdrawal vs continued groups
Schaffer et al[51], 2017Retrospective case-control studyPatients with diabetes and BP (n = 23) compared with patients with only diabetes (n = 170)NARange: 5-48 mo77.6 yrFavourable outcome after gliptin withdrawal; however topical and systemic therapy were required in most of the cases
Béné et al[59], 2016Case/non case analysis from databasePatients with BP (n = 150) compared with other spontaneous adverse drug reactionsNA10 mo (range 8 d-37 mo)74 yr (range 45-91)Favourable outcome in patients when DPP-4is were discontinued. Median time to improvement was 10 d ( interquartile range : 5-15 d)
Benzaquen et al[68], 2018Retrospective case-control study with 1:2 designPatients with diabetes and BP (n = 61) compared with patients with only diabetes (n = 122)Male aOR 4.36 (95%CI: 1.38-13.83), females 1.64 (95%CI: 0.53-5.11)Median 8.2 mo (range 10 d to 3 yr)79.1 ± 7.0 yrFavourable outcome when DPP-4is were discontinued
Kridin and Bergman[71], 2018Retrospective case-control studyDiabetes patients with BP (n = 82) vs age and gender matched control population with only diabetes (n = 328)Male OR 4.46 (95%CI: 2.11-9.40), female OR 1.88 (95%CI: 0.92-3.86)Median 10.4 mo (range 1.0-26.5 mo)79.1 ± 9.1 yrFavourable outcome in gliptin withdrawal group