Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Diabetes. Apr 15, 2021; 12(4): 331-343
Published online Apr 15, 2021. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v12.i4.331
Table 2 Effects of hypoxia vs normoxia chronic exercise in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus or insulin-resistance
Ref.
Participants
Intervention
Intensity
Frequency and duration
Main results
Wiesner et al[69] (2010)1n = 45. NTG: sex: 8 male, 13 females; age: 42.1 ± 1.7yr; BMI: 32.5 ± 0.8. HTG: sex: 10 male, 14 females; age: 42.2 ± 1.2 yr; BMI: 33.1 ± 0.360 min running on a treadmill; normobaric hypoxia: simulated altitude: ca. 2740 mVO2peak: 65%3 d/wk, 4 wkLactate levels at the anaerobic threshold: ↓ HTG; fasting insulin, HOMA-IR: ↓ NTG, HTG; body fat decreased: HTG > NTG; BP, LDL-c: ↔ NTG, HTG
Schreuder et al[66] (2014)2n = 19. NTG: sex: 5 male, 4 females; age: 52.0 ± 8.0 yr; BMI: 36.0 ± 6.5 kg/m2. HTG: sex: 9 male, 1 female; age: 57.0 ± 6.0 yr; BMI: 30.9 ± 4.1 kg/m245 min endurance training (cycling) + series of strength training exercises; normobaric hypoxia: FiO2: 16.5%: simulated altitude: ca. 2100 mHRR: 70%-75%3 d/wk, 8 wkVO2max: ↑ NTG, HTG; BMI, BP, HOMA-IR, HDL-c, LDL-c, TC, TG, fasting glucose, HbA1c: ↔ NTG, HTG; Vasodilatory function: ↔ NTG, HTG