Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Diabetes. Aug 15, 2020; 11(8): 322-350
Published online Aug 15, 2020. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v11.i8.322
Table 4 Major studies onf the effect of bariatric surgery on renal outcomes
AuthorsYear, countryFollow upPatientsSurgical/controlSurgical procedureDiabetes, CVD, RDOutcomes
Serra et al[192]2015, Spain (76 ± 42 mo)92 vs noneGBD2: 14%No WRF
Renal biopsyGlomerulopathy 75%A decrease in creatinine and albuminuria
No progression (not related to glomerular lesions)
Neff et al[142]201, France (1 and 5 yr)190 vs 271RYGB vsD2: 39%. CVD:Improvement in eGFR in both procedures
LAGB28%. CKD: 4%
RYGB better in remission of hypertension
RYGB better in diabetes
Nehus et al[143]2017, United States242 vs none3 yrD2: 12.6%eGFR increased by 3.9 mL/min per 1.73 m2 for each 10-unit loss of BMI.
RYGB 66.5%Albuminuria: 17%
SG: 27.7%A decrease in ACR
AGB: 5.8%
Wakamatsu[141]2018, Japan254LSG 24D2: 51%Improvement of eGFRcys in mild CKD (eGFRcys ≥ 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2)
LSG-DJB 94
LRYGB 26
LAGB 10
NS: eGFRcys in moderate CKD (< 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2)
Solini et al[138]2019, Italy25 vs none1 yrNo D2. No HTAImprovement in mGFR
RYGBImprovement in a renal resistive index and correlates with mGFR
Lowers carotid intima-media thickness
Inge et al[144]2019, United StatesAdoles vs adults5 yrD2: 14% vs 31%HTA and D2 remissions are higher in adolescents than in adults. Rate of death (NS)
161 vs 396RYGBHTA: 30% vs 61%