Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Diabetes. Jun 15, 2019; 10(6): 362-375
Published online Jun 15, 2019. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v10.i6.362
Published online Jun 15, 2019. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v10.i6.362
Quartiles of total- and various types of vegetable consumption | P value forTrend1 | ||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
Total vegetables | |||||
Median intake, g/d | 104 | 179 | 265 | 441 | |
Range of intake, g/d | ≤ 146 | 147-217 | 218-343 | ≥ 350 | |
Model 1 | 1 | 0.66 (0.30-1.47) | 0.54 (0.23–1.25) | 0.42 (0.17–0.92) | 0.06 |
Model 2 | 1 | 0.54 (0.21-1.46) | 0.42 (0.16-1.07) | 0.36 (0.14-0.94) | 0.04 |
Model 3 | 1 | 0.53 (0.20-1.46) | 0.41 (0.15-1.10) | 0.35 (0.13-0.95) | 0.04 |
Allium vegetables | |||||
Median intake, g/d | 2.7 | 10.8 | 22.8 | 51.5 | |
Range of intake, g/d | ≤6.2 | 6.3-17.3 | 17.4-30.5 | ≥ 30.6 | |
Model 1 | 1 | 0.68 (0.31-1.47) | 0.44 (0.19-1.05) | 0.34 (0.13-0.87) | 0.024 |
Model 2 | 1 | 0.55 (0.23-1.31) | 0.27 (0.11-0.74) | 0.21 (0.11-0.64) | 0.006 |
Model 3 | 1 | 0.56 (0.24-1.32) | 0.35 (0.13-0.89) | 0.27 (0.14-0.75) | 0.012 |
Green leafy vegetables | |||||
Median intake, g/d | 9.1 | 17.6 | 27.3 | 54.4 | |
Range of intake, g/d | ≤13.5 | 13.6-21.3 | 21.4-38.3 | ≥ 38.4 | |
Model 1 | 1 | 0.42 (0.18-0.98) | 0.32 (0.13- 0.80) | 0.58 (0.26-1.27) | 0.37 |
Model 2 | 1 | 0.40 (0.16-1.02) | 0.32 (0.12-0.89) | 0.81 (0.32-2.01) | 0.98 |
Model 3 | 1 | 0.42 (0.16-1.11) | 0.40 (0.13-0.91) | 1.12 (0.39-3.19) | 0.51 |
Fruity vegetables | |||||
Median intake, g/d | 42 | 93 | 145 | 263 | |
Range of intake, g/d | ≤ 69 | 70-115 | 116-211 | ≥ 212 | |
Model 1 | 1 | 0.61 (0.25-1.47) | 0.61 (0.25–1.47) | 1.08 (0.49–2.37) | 0.69 |
Model 2 | 1 | 0.65 (0.25-1.65) | 0.64 (0.25-1.65) | 1.01 (0.38-2.68) | 0.34 |
Model 3 | 1 | 0.71 (0.27-1.87) | 0.84 (0.32-2.23) | 1.65 (0.57-4.80) | 0.44 |
Root vegetables | |||||
Median intake, g/d | 2.1 | 7.3 | 10.0 | 34.4 | |
Range of intake, g/d | ≤ 4.2 | 4.3-9.9 | 10.0-21.9 | ≥ 22.0 | |
Model 1 | 1 | 0.57 (0.20-1.64) | 2.23 (0.99-5.03) | 1.11 (0.45-2.74) | 0.89 |
Model 2 | 1 | 0.72 (0.24-2.12) | 1.74 (0.72-4.17) | 1.13 (0.43-2.97) | 0.87 |
Model 3 | 1 | 0.68 (0.22-2.07) | 1.88 (0.75-4.72) | 1.45 (0.50-4.13) | 0.51 |
Stalk vegetables | |||||
Median intake, g/d | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 2.5 | |
Range of intake, g/d | ≤ 0.00 | 0.1-0.5 | 0.6-1.1 | ≥ 1.2 | |
Model 1 | 1 | 0.57 (0.24-1.36) | 0.54 (0.23-1.29) | 0.88 (0.40-1.94) | 0.86 |
Model 2 | 1 | 0.52 (0.20-1.36) | 0.51 (0.20-1.31) | 1.09 (0.46-2.58) | 0.51 |
Model 3 | 1 | 0.61 (0.23-1.62) | 0.57 (0.21-1.51) | 1.32 (0.52-3.34) | 0.34 |
Potatoes | |||||
Median intake, g/d | 2.4 | 10.3 | 20.7 | 36.3 | |
Range of intake, g/d | ≤4.8 | 4.9-10.4 | 10.5-20.8 | ≥ 20.9 | |
Model 1 | 1 | 0.69 (0.32-1.50) | 0.97 (0.41- 2.28) | 0.80 (0.32-1.99) | 0.84 |
Model 2 | 1 | 0.54 (0.23- 1.27) | 0.86 (0.34-2.21) | 0.68 (0.25-1.85) | 0.72 |
Model 3 | 1 | 0.58 (0.23-1.44) | 1.03 (0.38- 2.76) | 0.55 (0.17-1.68) | 0.54 |
Starchy vegetables | |||||
Median intake, g/d | 1.9 | 4.7 | 8.2 | 18.2 | |
Range of intake, g/d | ≤ 3.3 | 3.4-5.8 | 5.-12.6 | ≥ 12.7 | |
Model 1 | 1 | 0.91 (0.39-2.11) | 1.0 (0.44-2.27) | 0.66 (0.27-1.62) | 0.36 |
Model 2 | 1 | 0.92 (0.37-2.31) | 0.93 (0.38-2.26) | 0.60 (0.22-1.62) | 0.29 |
Model 3 | 1 | 0.99 (0.38-2.56) | 0.80 (0.30-2.13) | 0.80 (0.26-2.45) | 0.41 |
Cabbage | |||||
Median intake, g/d | 0.0 | 1.9 | 6.2 | 15.3 | |
Range of intake, g/d | ≤ 0.0 | 0.1 – 3.1 | 3.2-6.2 | ≥ 6.3 | |
Model 1 | 1 | 0.74 (0.36-1.52) | 1.12 (0.40-3.14) | 0.54 (0.21-1.38) | 0.18 |
Model 2 | 1 | 0.79 (0.36-1.71) | 1.25 (0.42-3.79) | 0.51 (0.18-1.45) | 0.07 |
Model 3 | 1 | 0.94 (0.42-2.10) | 1.50 (0.48-4.69) | 0.56 (0.18-1.71) | 0.09 |
- Citation: Hosseinpour-Niazi S, Bakhshi B, Betru E, Mirmiran P, Darand M, Azizi F. Prospective study of total and various types of vegetables and the risk of metabolic syndrome among children and adolescents. World J Diabetes 2019; 10(6): 362-375
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v10/i6/362.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v10.i6.362