Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Diabetes. Feb 15, 2019; 10(2): 114-132
Published online Feb 15, 2019. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v10.i2.114
Table 4 Assessment of study quality of randomised controlled trials
StudyCriteriaRisk of biasStudy quality
Kuchay et al[11]Random sequence generationLow riskGood quality
Allocation concealmentLow risk
Selective reportingLow risk
Other biasLow risk
Blinding of participants and personnelLow risk
Blinding of outcome assessmentLow risk
Incomplete outcome dataLow risk
Ito et al[12]Random sequence generationLow riskFair quality
Allocation concealmentUnclear risk
Selective reportingLow risk
Other biasLow risk
Blinding of participants and personnelLow risk
Blinding of outcome assessmentLow risk
Incomplete outcome dataLow risk
Shibuya et al[13]Random sequence generationUnclear riskFair quality
Allocation concealmentUnclear risk
Selective reportingLow risk
Other biasLow risk
Blinding of participants and personnelLow risk
Blinding of outcome assessmentLow risk
Incomplete outcome dataLow risk
Eriksson et al[14]Random sequence generationLow riskGood quality
Allocation concealmentLow risk
Selective reportingLow risk
Other biasLow risk
Blinding of participants and personnelLow risk
Blinding of outcome assessmentLow risk
Incomplete outcome dataLow risk