Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jun 15, 2017; 9(6): 235-250
Published online Jun 15, 2017. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v9.i6.235
Published online Jun 15, 2017. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v9.i6.235
Challenges | Potential solutions |
Metastatic probability increases dramatically with larger tumor size | Promote development of early detection methods (circulating tumor cells, extracellular vesicles, molecular cargo in CTCs and EVs, cfDNA, ctDNA) |
Tumor mutations develop up to two decades with metastatic mutations occurring late in the process | Identify founder mutations that correlate with unusual survival outcomes |
Pancreatic stroma influences treatment sensitivity | Promote research on stromal characterization |
Transporter expression in the tumor impacts drug delivery | Identify expression features that correlate with treatment sensitivity to a variety of drugs |
CA 19-9 is not pancreatic cancer specific | Promote development of assays for biomarker panels that increase CA 19-9 utility that will be eligible for FDA approval |
Prediction of resectability is only 70%-85% accurate | Improve staging based on biopsies by implementing clinical use of digital pathology methods |
No FDA-approved digital pathology methods exist for pancreatic cancer | Combine digital pathology with accepted primary diagnostic methods and test special controls for digital imaging that will permit FDA application through a more streamlined de novo pathway |
- Citation: Moravec R, Divi R, Verma M. Detecting circulating tumor material and digital pathology imaging during pancreatic cancer progression. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2017; 9(6): 235-250
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v9/i6/235.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v9.i6.235