Risk factors for the development of colorectal carcinoma: A case control study from South India

doi:10.4251/wjgo.v8.i2.207

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 8, Issue 2

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (9175)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Tables (1-5) series.

Item

Count

PDF

469

WORD

220

HTML

3435

Tables (1-5)

197

Sum=4321

Featured Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

500

Download

1475

Sum=1975

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

1027

Download

1852

Sum=2879

Feb 15, 2016 (publication date) through Jul 17, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (6)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology

ISSN

1948-5204

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Case Control Study

World J Gastrointest Oncol. Feb 15, 2016; 8(2): 207-214
Published online Feb 15, 2016. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v8.i2.207

Table 2 Frequency of food intake among cases and controls, n (%)

Food item		Never or hardly ever	Once a month	2-3 times/mo	Once a week	2-3 times/wk	4-6 times/wk	Once a day	Total
Egg	Case	7 (7.4)	17 (18.1)	6 (6.4)	28 (29.8)	21 (22.3)	7 (7.4)	8 (8.5)	94
Egg	Control	8 (8.5)	36 (38.3)	10 (10.6)	27 (28.7)	8 (8.5)	-	5 (5.3)	94
Chicken	Case	13 (13.8)	31 (33)	9 (9.6)	36 (38.3)	5 (5.3)	-	-	94
Chicken	Control	12 (12.8)	45 (47.9)	14 (14.9)	19 (20.2)	4 (4.3)	-	-	94
Mutton	Case	23 (24.5)	40 (42.6)	4 (4.3)	25 (26.6)	1 (1.1)	1 (1.1)	-	94
Mutton	Control	44 (46.8)	42 (44.7)	3 (3.2)	4 (4.3)	1 (1.1)	-	-	94
Fish	Case	26 (27.7)	49 (52.1)	2 (2.1)	6 (6.4)	10 (10.6)	1 (1.1)	-	94
Fish	Control	27 (28.7)	61 (64.9)	1 (1.1)	2 (2.1)	1 (1.1)	2 (2.1)	-	94
Beef	Case	68 (72.3)	1 (1.1)	1 (1.1)	18 (19.1)	6 (6.4)	-	-	94
Beef	Control	81 (86.2)	6 (6.4)	-	7 (7.4)	-	-	-	94
Pork	Case	81 (86.2)	9 (9.6)	1 (1.1)	2 (2.1)	1 (1.1)	-	-	94
Pork	Control	87 (92.6)	5 (5.3)	-	2 (2.1)	-	-	-	94
Fried foods	Case	3 (3.2)	32 (34.0)	6 (6.4)	35 (37.2)	18 (19.1)	-	-	94
Fried foods	Control	5 (5.3)	45 (47.9)	14 (14.9)	28 (29.8)	2 (2.1)	-	-	94
Fruits	Case	32 (34.0)	37 (39.4)	7 (7.4)	6 (6.4)	5 (5.3)	3 (3.2)	4 (4.3)	94
Fruits	Control	36 (38.3)	23 (24.5)	14 (14.9)	13 (13.8)	3 (3.2)	-	5 (5.3)	94
Vegetables	Case	-	-	-	-	13 (13.8)	7 (7.4)	74 (78.7)	94
Vegetables	Control	-	-	-	-	2 (2.1)	8 (8.5)	84 (89.4)	94
Coffee	Case	81 (86.2)		-	-	-	-	13 (13.8)	94
	Control	87 (92.6)	-	-	-	-	-	7 (7.4)	94
Tea	Case	20 (21.2)		-	-	-	-	74 (78.7)	94
	Control	11 (11.7)	-	-	-	-	-	83 (88.3)	94

Citation: Iswarya SK, Premarajan KC, Kar SS, Kumar SS, Kate V. Risk factors for the development of colorectal carcinoma: A case control study from South India. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2016; 8(2): 207-214
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v8/i2/207.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v8.i2.207