Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Dec 15, 2016; 8(12): 826-834
Published online Dec 15, 2016. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v8.i12.826
Table 2 Articles summarizing the risk of future colonic neoplasia based on the size of polyps seen at baseline colonoscopy
Ref.Sample sizeMedian follow-up, yrPredictorPrimary outcomeAbsolute risk of outcome (%)RR [95%CI]
RCT
Laiyemo et al[11]19054≥ 10 mmACN9 (7-11) vs 5 (4-6)0.9 [0.6-1.4]
Bonithon-Kopp et al[9]5523≥ 10 mmACN7.1 vs 7.81.1 [0.5-2.1]
Pooled analysis
Martínez et al[14]8 studies3.9< 5 mmACN8.7 (7.7-9.7)Ref
916710-19 mm15.9 (14.5-17.4)2.3 [1.8-2.8]
≥ 20 mm19.3 (16.4-22.3)3.0 [2.2-4.0]
Meta-analysis
Saini I et al[10]5 studies3≥ 10 mmACN2% risk difference (-2 to 6)1.4 [0.9-2.3]
Prospective
Bertario et al[15]108610.5≥ 20 mmAny adenomaNot available1.5 [1.1-2.1]
CRCSIRNot available
Baseline0.52 [0.3-0.9]
< 10 mm0.33 [0.1-0.9]
≥ 10 mm0.82 [0.3-1.8]
Lieberman et al[12]11935.5≥ 10 mmACN15.5 vs 2.46.4 [2.7-14.9]
Chung et al[8]38084.5≥ 10 mmACNNot available3.0 [1.8-5.1]
Registry
Van Heijningen et al[13]29902≥ 10 mmAA8 vs 41.7 [1.2-2.3]