Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Dec 15, 2016; 8(12): 826-834
Published online Dec 15, 2016. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v8.i12.826
Table 1 Articles summarizing the risk of neoplasia based on the histology of polyps seen at baseline colonoscopy
Ref.Sample sizeMedian follow-up, yrPredictorPrimary outcomeAbsolute risk of outcome (%)RR1 [95%CI]
RCT
Laiyemo et al[11]19054VillousACN9 (7-11) vs 5 (4-6)2.3 [1.5-3.4]
Bonithon-Kopp et al[9]5523HGDACN9.8 vs 5.51.9 [1.0-3.6]
Villous10.3 vs. 6.81.7 [0.8-3.7]
Pooled analysis
Martínez et al[14]8 studies3.9HGDACN16.0 (13.2-18.7) vs 10.6 (9.8-11.3)1.1 [0.8-1.4]
9167Villous16.8 (15.1-18.5) vs 9.7 (9.0-10.4)1.3 [1.1-1.5]
Meta-analysis
Saini et al[10]5 studies3HGDACN4% risk difference (0-8)1.8 [1.1-3.2]
Villous2% risk difference (-1 to 4)1.3 [1.0-1.7]
Prospective
Bertario et al[15]108610.5HGDCRC2.8 SIR (0.3-10.2) vs 0.52Not available
Tubulovillous VillousAny adenomaNot available1.3 [1.0-1.6]
1.8 [1.2-2.6]
2Lieberman et al[12]11935.5No adenomasACN2.4Ref
HGD176.8 [2.6-18.1]
Villous166.1 [2.5-14.7]
Chung et al[8]38084.5VillousACNNot available1.5 [0.7- 3.0]
Registry
Van Heijningen et al[13]29902HGDAA131.2 [0.8-1.8]
Villous82.0 [1.2-3.2]
HGDACN11Not available
Villous17