Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Dec 15, 2016; 8(12): 819-825
Published online Dec 15, 2016. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v8.i12.819
Published online Dec 15, 2016. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v8.i12.819
Table 6 Impact of location on outcome
| Parameter | Colon | Rectum | Significance |
| Recurrence after curative resection | |||
| Peritoneal, n (%) | 15/40 (37.5) | 8/48 (16.7) | 0.062 |
| Non-peritoneal, n (%) | 3/40 (7.5) | 7/48 (14.6) | |
| Pattern of Metastases at presentation | |||
| Peritoneal, n (%) | 45/49 (91.8) | 15/18 (83.3) | 0.074 |
| Non-peritoneal, n (%) | 4/49 (9.2) | 3/18 (16.7) | |
| RFS (mo) | 24.74 | 34.02 | 0.048 |
| Overall Survival (mo) | 26.011 | 30.32 | 0.062 |
| OS after curative surgery (mo) | 32.298 | 40.089 | 0.058 |
- Citation: Tamhankar AS, Ingle P, Engineer R, Bal M, Ostwal V, Saklani A. Signet ring colorectal carcinoma: Do we need to improve the treatment algorithm? World J Gastrointest Oncol 2016; 8(12): 819-825
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v8/i12/819.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v8.i12.819