Copyright
©2012 Baishideng.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Apr 15, 2012; 4(4): 84-88
Published online Apr 15, 2012. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v4.i4.84
Published online Apr 15, 2012. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v4.i4.84
Tumor differentiation | Margin status | Lymphovascular invasion | Group | Type of recurrence | Salvage therapy | Follow up (mo) | Remarks |
Poor | Negative | Positive | A | Rectum lung | Chemoradiotherapy1 | 52 | Dead |
Poor | Positive | Negative | B | Rectum liver | Chemotherapy1 | 38 | Dead |
Poor | Positive | Negative | B | Rectum | APR | 52 | Alive |
Poor | Negative | Positive | B | Rectum lung | Chemoradiotherapy1 | 28 | Dead |
Moderate | Positive | Negative | B | Rectum | LAR | 48 | Alive |
Moderate | Negative | Positive | B | Rectum liver | Chemotherapy1 | 35 | Dead |
Well | Negative | Positive | B | Rectum | Colostomy1 | 46 | Dead |
- Citation: Wu ZY, Zhao G, Chen Z, Du JL, Wan J, Lin F, Peng L. Oncological outcomes of transanal local excision for high risk T1 rectal cancers. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2012; 4(4): 84-88
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v4/i4/84.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v4.i4.84