Copyright
©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jun 15, 2010; 2(6): 251-258
Published online Jun 15, 2010. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v2.i6.251
Published online Jun 15, 2010. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v2.i6.251
Subbuswamy et al[2] | APX |
RH in case of cecal involvement | |
Klein[3] | APX |
Haqqani et al[40] | RH if base of appendix or caecum is involved |
Warkel et al[4] | RH in case of spread beyond appendix, atypia, and mitotic count ≥ 2/10 hpf |
Chen et al[41] | APX alone unless there is cecal involvement |
Olsson et al[42] | RH in case of spread beyond appendix, atypia, and mitotic count ≥ 2/10 hpf |
Edmonds et al[33] | RH in all cases |
Bak et al[39] | RH in case of spread beyond appendix, atypia, and mitotic count ≥ 2/10 hpf |
Park et al[43] | RH in all cases |
Rutledge et al[44] | RH in all cases |
Butler et al[36] | RH for cecal involvement, BSO in females |
Ramnani et al[13] | < 2 cm in size, without serosal & lymphatic involvement-APX |
More advanced tumor-RH | |
Kanthan et al[30] | RH |
Li et al[31] | RH for N1, M1 or Mib1 > 3% |
Varisco et al[23] | RH in case of spread beyond appendix, atypia, and mitotic count ≥ 2/10 hpf |
Byrn et al[35] | No value of RH in non-metastatic cases |
Pham et al[22] | RH with attendant mesenteric nodal resection for (1) T3/T4 disease or nodal involvement; (2) direct cecal involvement; and (3) clinically positive mesenteric nodes |
Bilateral oophorectomy for post menopausal women | |
O’Donnell et al[20] | RH irrespective of stage |
Tang et al[17] | Group A T1, 2-no recommendations |
T3 or 4, group B/C, perforation, positive margin-RH with oophorectomy if possible. CT in stage III/IV | |
Stage IV/group C- debulking/oophorectomy/systemic/intraperitoneal CT |
- Citation: Roy P, Chetty R. Goblet cell carcinoid tumors of the appendix: An overview. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2010; 2(6): 251-258
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v2/i6/251.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v2.i6.251