Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Apr 15, 2025; 17(4): 103131
Published online Apr 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i4.103131
Published online Apr 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i4.103131
Table 2 Comparison of the treatment efficacy in patients in the two groups, n (%)
Variables | Total (n = 115) | Control group (n = 56) | RH-endostatin group (n = 59) | χ2 | P value |
CR | 19 (16.5) | 8 (14.3) | 11 (18.6) | ||
PR | 50 (43.5) | 20 (35.7) | 30 (50.8) | ||
SD | 20 (17.4) | 12 (21.4) | 8 (13.7) | ||
PD | 26 (22.6) | 16 (28.6) | 10 (16.9) | ||
ORR | 69 (60.0) | 28 (50.0) | 41 (69.4) | 4.548 | 0.033 |
DCR | 89 (77.4) | 40 (71.4) | 49 (83.1) | 2.218 | 0.136 |
- Citation: Liu Y, Liu HG, Zhao C. Intraperitoneal perfusion of endostatin improves the effectiveness and prolongs the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(4): 103131
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v17/i4/103131.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v17.i4.103131