Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Apr 15, 2025; 17(4): 102038
Published online Apr 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i4.102038
Published online Apr 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i4.102038
Table 2 Comparison of treatment response rates between transarterial chemoembolization and transarterial chemoembolization + radiofrequency ablation groups, n (%)
Factors | TACE group (n = 56) | TACE + RFA group (n = 50) | χ² value | P value |
Complete response | 4 (7.1) | 15 (30.0) | 19.036 | < 0.01 |
Partial response | 15 (26.8) | 23 (46.0) | 3.992 | 0.046 |
Stable disease | 25 (44.6) | 7 (14.0) | 9.413 | < 0.01 |
Progressive disease | 12 (21.4) | 5 (10.0) | 13.518 | < 0.01 |
- Citation: Fei J, Qi LW, Liu Y, Shu M, Mo WQ. Comparing transarterial chemoembolization alone to combined transarterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation in primary hepatocellular carcinoma treatment. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(4): 102038
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v17/i4/102038.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v17.i4.102038