Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Apr 15, 2025; 17(4): 101832
Published online Apr 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i4.101832
Published online Apr 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i4.101832
Table 1 A comparative analysis of main endoscopic resection techniques
Technique | Indications | Pros | Cons |
Endoscopic mucosal resection | Small, superficial lesions from the mucosal layer (ex. early-stage cancers and adenomas) | Preserves tissue, maintains function, simple technique | Limited size, risk of incomplete resection |
Endoscopic submucosal dissection | Larger lesions reaching the submucosal layer | En bloc resection, enables complete resection | More complex, higher complication rate |
Endoscopic full-thickness resection | Invasive lesions involving the full-thickness, reaching into the muscularis layer | Minimally invasive with lower recovery time compared to surgery | Complex procedure, significant perforation risk |
- Citation: Tawheed A, Ismail A, El-Kassas M, El-Fouly A, Madkour A. Endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal tumors: Training levels and professional roles explored. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(4): 101832
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v17/i4/101832.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v17.i4.101832