Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. May 15, 2024; 16(5): 1796-1807
Published online May 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i5.1796
Published online May 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i5.1796
Figure 2 Levels of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging parameters and tumor markers in different differentiation degrees.
A: Comparison of volume transfer constant between low (L) and moderate + high (M + H) groups; B: Comparison of rate constant between L and M + H groups; C: Comparison of extravascular extracellular volume fraction between L and M + H groups; D: Comparison of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) between L and M + H groups; E: Comparison of CA125 between L and M + H groups. M + H: Moderate + high; L: Low; Ktrans: Volume transfer constant; Kep: Rate constant; Ve: Extravascular extracellular volume fraction; CA19-9: Carbohydrate antigen 199; CA12-5: Carbohydrate antigen 125.
- Citation: Mu RQ, Lv JW, Ma CY, Ma XH, Xing D, Ma HS. Diagnostic performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging parameters and serum tumor markers in rectal carcinoma prognosis. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16(5): 1796-1807
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v16/i5/1796.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v16.i5.1796