Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. May 15, 2024; 16(5): 2141-2158
Published online May 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i5.2141
Table 4 Overview of articles reporting on survival outcomes for colorectal signet-ring cell carcinoma
Report
5-yr OS (SRC vs other)
5-yr OS in stage III tumors
5-yr DFS % (SRC vs other)
Song et al[25], 20175-yr CSS: 85.6% (colon: 89.2%, rectum: 73.3%) vs 90.7% MA (P = 0.17) (colon: 90.5%; rectum: 91.6%) vs 93.3% AC (P = 0.013) (colon: 93.8%; rectum: 92.2%)NANA
Wu et al[9], 20185-yr CSS: Colon: 33.2%; rectum: 28.1%NANA
Hartmann et al[16], 201366% mucin-rich vs 19% mucin-poor (P = 0.0035); 75% MSI-H vs 48% MSSNA66% mucin-rich vs 0% mucin-poor (P = 0.0001); 73% MSI-H vs 31% MSS
van Oudheusden et al[59], 20153-yr OS: 0% vs 44% NANA
Wu et al[10], 201926.8% vs 50.6% MA vs 60.2% OA (HR: 1.592, 95%CI: 1.558-1.627, P < 0.001)NANA
Hyngstrom et al[19], 2012NARelative survival: Colon IIIa: 0.81 vs 0.87 MA vs 0.86 OA; IIIb: 0.49 vs 0.66 MA vs 0.65 OA; IIIc: 0.21 vs 0.42 MA vs 0.45 OA; rectum IIIa: 0.91 vs 0.82 MA vs 0.86 OA; IIIb: 0.55 vs 0.56 MA vs 0.64 OA; IIIc: 0.3 vs 0.44 MA vs 0.48 OANA
Hugen et al[17], 2015Relative survival: Colon: 31% vs 58% MA vs 57% OA; rectum: 20% vs 54% MA vs 57% OARelative survival: Colon: 36% vs 54% MA vs 57% OA; rectum: 25% vs 45% MA vs 54% OANA
Kang et al[12], 200526.8% vs 58.1% MA (P < 0.0001) vs 62.9% OA (P < 0.0001)IIIa: 68.3% vs 87.3% MC vs 83.8% OA; IIIb: 46% vs 64.3% MC (P = 0.0002) vs 63.6% OA (P <0.0001); IIIc: 19% vs 29.2% MC (P <0.0001) vs 30% OA (P <0.0001)NA
Ciarrocchi[4], 201432% (32% rectum vs 33% colon)NANA
Huang et al[26], 20165-yr CSS: 52.2% (< 35 yr poorer CSS than > 35 yr, P < 0.001 at cutoff of 30 y, P < 0.001 at cutoff of 35 y, P = 0.015 at cutoff 40 yr)NANA
Ling et al[50], 2017NA34.% vs 53.9% (MA) vs 63.1% (OA; P = 0.001)NA
Wu et al[11], 201739%NANA
Thota et al[30], 2014NA19% vs 41% MA vs 47% (P = 0.0002)NA
Nitsche et al[33], 201340.3% (95%CI: 32.1-48.5) vs 58.7% (95%CI: 58.0-59.3)NANA
Fu et al[58], 20169.66% vs 24.04% (non-SRCC)NANA
Kakar and Smyrk[44], 200541% MSI-H vs 34% MSS (P = 0.3)NANA
Sung et al[21], 20083-yr CSS: 33% vs 74% MA (P < 0.0001)NANA
Chen et al[6], 200423.3 % vs 40.3% (MA) vs 54.5 % (NMA) (P < 0.001)32.5% vs 38.3% (MA) vs 41.5% (NMA)NA
Wang et al[43], 20163-yr OS: 62.7%NANA
Liang et al[31], 201810.80%Mean survival time in stage III tumors: 37.1 ± 3.9 (22-80) moNA
Lee et al[52], 200725.3% vs 68.6% MA vs 53.7% poorly differentiated OA (P < 0.001)14.5% vs 61.5% MA vs 46.3% (P < 0.001)12.3% vs 59.9% MA vs 46.8% poorly differentiated OA (P < 0.001)
Bittorf et al[8], 200414.7% vs 53.6% (P < 0.001)20.8% vs 62.6%NA
Messerini et al (1995)[32]9.10%NANA
Bademci et al[28], 2019NANA16 (47%) disease-free during follow-up
Kakar et al[45], 201233% vs 50% MA vs 63% (P = 0.09)III/IV: 27% vs 43% MA vs 57% OA (P = 0.03)NA
Chew et al[22], 20105-yr CSS: 11.1% (0-22.9%) vs overall 57.4% (55.4%-59.4%; P <0.001)NANo statistical difference (P = 0.356)
Nitsche et al[1], 20165-yr CSS: 21% ± 8% vs 61% ± 3% MA vs 67% ± 1% OA (P < 0.001)5-yr CSS for stage III: 15% ± 10% vs 60% ± 5% MA vs 65% ± 2% OA (P < 0.001)NA
Anthony et al[7], 199622%NANA
Song et al[64], 200927% vs 51% MA vs 69% (P < 0.01)NANA
Zhang et al[65], 202031.3% ± 12.9% vs 58.1% ± 7.7% (P = 0.018)NANA
Wang et al[39], 201937.3% (95%CI: 14.4%-61.2%) vs 62.9% (95%CI: 48.5%-74.3%; P = 0.021)NANA
Song et al[66], 2019SRCC predominant MAC with worse survival (P < 0.001)NANA
Mizushima et al[36], 201024.1% vs 77.5% well/moderately differentiated vs 57.7% poorly differentiated/MANANA
Foda et al[42], 201810.5% vs 23.2% MA vs 42.9% AWMC vs 55.3% OANA3-yr DFS: 11.1% vs 28.3% MA vs 60.7% OA with SRC component vs 63% OA
Lee et al[29], 201546% vs 88.7% (P > 0.001)NANA
Pozos-Ochoa et al[37], 20183-yr CSS: 28.6% vs 80.7% (P = 0.017) (II, III, and IV: 100%, 33%, and 0% vs 100%, 78%, and 73%, P = 0.017)NANA
Sasaki et al[14], 19980% vs 76.5 % (3 mo-85 mo) (P < 0.0001)NANA
Ooi et al[23], 200112%NANA
Secco et al[68], 19940% vs 28% MA vs 45% OANANA