Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. May 15, 2024; 16(5): 1878-1889
Published online May 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i5.1878
Published online May 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i5.1878
Table 3 Logistic regression analysis: Comparison of model 1 and model 2
Model | Observed | Predicted | ||||
Without independent predictors | Stage type | Percentage correct | ||||
Early | Late | |||||
Model 1 (TAM density + M2 proportion) | Step 0 | Stage type: Early or late | Early | 0 | 17 | 0 |
Late | 0 | 26 | 100 | |||
Overall percentage | 60.5 | |||||
Step 1 | Stage type: Early or late | Early | 6 | 11 | 35.31 | |
Late | 6 | 20 | 76.92 | |||
Overall percentage | 60.53 | |||||
Model 2 (TAM density + M2 proportion + tumor grade + lymphovascular invasion) | Step 0 | Stage type: Early or late | Early | 0 | 17 | 0 |
Late | 0 | 26 | 100 | |||
Overall percentage | 60.5 | |||||
Step 1 | Stage type: Early or late | Early | 13 | 4 | 76.51 | |
Late | 4 | 22 | 84.62 | |||
Overall percentage | 81.43 |
- Citation: Fazal F, Khan MA, Shawana S, Rashid R, Mubarak M. Correlation of tumor-associated macrophage density and proportion of M2 subtypes with the pathological stage of colorectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16(5): 1878-1889
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v16/i5/1878.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v16.i5.1878