Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Mar 15, 2024; 16(3): 1046-1058
Published online Mar 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i3.1046
Published online Mar 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i3.1046
Figure 2 Network meta-analysis of R0 resection rate.
A: Network diagram of R0 resection rate; B: The published biased funnel plot of R0 resection rate; C: Comparisons between each treatment; D: Surface under the cumulative ranking value of R0 resection rate of each intervention. Bold and underlined indicate statistically significant pairwise comparisons. A: Neoadjuvant ECF; B: Neoadjuvant FLOT; C: Neoadjuvant DCS; D: Neoadjuvant CS; E: Neoadjuvant DCF; F: Neoadjuvant DOS; G: Neoadjuvant ECF plus Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy; H: Neoadjuvant FLO; I: Neoadjuvant SOX; J: Neoadjuvant XELOX; K: Neoadjuvant DOX; L: Neoadjuvant XELOX plus Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy; M: Neoadjuvant SOX plus Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy; N: Neoadjuvant CF; O: Neoadjuvant PC; P: Neoadjuvant FOLFOX; Q: Surgery alone.
- Citation: Kuang ZY, Sun QH, Cao LC, Ma XY, Wang JX, Liu KX, Li J. Efficacy and safety of perioperative therapy for locally resectable gastric cancer: A network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16(3): 1046-1058
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v16/i3/1046.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v16.i3.1046