Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Oct 15, 2024; 16(10): 4129-4137
Published online Oct 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i10.4129
Table 2 Comparison of polyp characteristics between high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia group and low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia group, n (%)
Endoscopic features
HGIN group (number of polyps = 93)
LGIN group (number of polyps = 132)
χ2
P value
Polyp site26.3480.000
        Ascending colon10 (10.75)29 (21.97)
        Transverse colon9 (9.68)32 (24.24)
        Descending colon15 (16.13)31 (23.48)
        Sigmoid34 (36.56)27 (20.45)
        Rectum25 (26.88)13 (9.85)
Endoscopic classification5.3710.020
        Calyx perpetual43 (46.24)41 (31.06)
        Calyx deciduous50 (53.76)91 (68.94)
Polyp cut area61 (65.59)10.3690.001
        ≥ 1.0 cm261 (65.59)21 (15.91)
        < 1.0 cm232 (34.41)111 (84.09)
Changes in surface color8.6800.003
        Hyperemia58 (62.37)56 (42.42)
        Uncongested35 (37.63)76 (57.58)
Surface depression8.0510.005
        Yes21 (22.6)4 (3.03)
        No72 (77.4)128 (96.97)
Pathological results24.5400.000
        Canalicular adenoma62 (66.67)87 (65.91)
        Villous tubular adenoma26 (27.96)12 (9.09)
        Serrated adenoma2 (2.15)6 (4.55)
        Non-adenomatous polyps3 (3.23)27 (20.45)