Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Sep 15, 2022; 14(9): 1711-1726
Published online Sep 15, 2022. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i9.1711
Published online Sep 15, 2022. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i9.1711
Table 4 The complete response rate and univariate regression of consolidation chemotherapy in the original samples before matching, after propensity score match and inverse probability of treatment weighting in the two groups
CR | Univariate regression | ||||
non-CC group, n (%) | CC group, n (%) | P value | OR (95%CI) | P value | |
Original samples | 21 (16.3) | 33 (24.3) | 0.107 | 1.648 (0.895-3.033) | 0.109 |
PSM | 17 (16.2) | 29 (27.6) | 0.045 | 1.975 (1.008-3.871) | 0.047 |
IPTW | 21 (16.3) | 35 (25.9) | 0.045 | 1.185 (1.008-3.395) | 0.047 |
- Citation: Sheng XQ, Wang HZ, Li S, Zhang YZ, Geng JH, Zhu XG, Quan JZ, Li YH, Cai Y, Wang WH. Consolidation chemotherapy with capecitabine after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in high-risk patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: Propensity score study. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2022; 14(9): 1711-1726
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v14/i9/1711.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v14.i9.1711