Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. May 15, 2022; 14(5): 1027-1036
Published online May 15, 2022. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i5.1027
Published online May 15, 2022. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i5.1027
Table 2 Quantitative analysis of target volume parameters
Indices | Before the education program | After the education program | t/Z value | P value |
Volume (cm3) | 809.82 ± 141.17 (624.69-1112.79) | 705.21 ± 100.53 (603.97-949.53) | -3.180 | 0.001 |
Length (cm) | 18.19 ± 1.01 (16.50-20.00) | 17.77 ± 0.60 (17.00-19.00) | 1.442 | 0.175 |
DSC | 0.78 ± 0.06 (0.68-0.87) | 0.84 ± 0.04 (0.71-0.88) | -2.621 | 0.009 |
IncI | 0.69 ± 0.10 (0.57-0.83) | 0.79 ± 0.08 (0.58-0.87) | -3.926 | 0.002 |
CI | 0.65 ± 0.08 (0.52-0.77) | 0.73 ± 0.06 (0.56-0.78) | -2.551 | 0.011 |
ΔV (%) | 30.79 ± 10.65 (17.33-47.65) | 21.43 ± 7.80 (12.93-41.70) | 3.926 | 0.002 |
- Citation: Zhang YZ, Zhu XG, Song MX, Yao KN, Li S, Geng JH, Wang HZ, Li YH, Cai Y, Wang WH. Improving the accuracy and consistency of clinical target volume delineation for rectal cancer by an education program. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2022; 14(5): 1027-1036
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v14/i5/1027.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v14.i5.1027