Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Oct 15, 2022; 14(10): 1903-1917
Published online Oct 15, 2022. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i10.1903
Table 6 Comparison of resection margin status between the upfront surgery group and the neoadjuvant therapy plus surgery group
Ref.
Country
NCT number/Name
Variable
Upfront surgery
NAT plus surgery
P value
Golcher et al[7]GermanyNCT00335543Resection rate23/33 (70%)19/33 (58%)0.31
R0 rate16/23 (70%)17/19 (89%)NM
ITT R0 rate16/33 (48%)17/33 (52%)0.81
Versteijne et al[8]NetherlandsPREOPANCResection rate54/68 (79%)44/65 (68%)0.17
R0 rate32/54 (59%)29/44 (66%)0.54
ITT R0 rate32/68 (47%)29/65 (45%)NM
Casadei et al[9]Italy-Resection rate15/20 (75%)11/18 (61%)0.489
R0 rate5/15 (33%)7/11 (64%)NM
ITT R0 rate5/20 (25%)7/18 (39%)0.489
Reni et al[10]ItalyPACT-15Resection rate49/56 (88%)27/32 (84%)NM
R0 rate16/49 (33%)17/27 (63%)NM
ITT R0 rate16/56 (29%)17/32 (53%)NM