Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Apr 15, 2021; 13(4): 279-294
Published online Apr 15, 2021. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i4.279
Published online Apr 15, 2021. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i4.279
Question | Option | Japan | Rest of Asia | P value |
Q1. What is your preferred endoscopic landmark of the esophagogastric junction? | Squamo-columnar Junction (Z-line) | 27.4% | 59.5% | < 0.001 |
Proximal margin of gastric folds | 12.6% | 27.8% | ||
Distal margin of palisade vessels | 59.0% | 10.0% | ||
Diaphragmatic pinch | 1.0% | 2.7% | ||
Q2. What is your preferred endoscopic definition of Barrett’s esophagus? | Length of columnar lined epithelium ≥ 2 cm | 23.2% | 35.9% | < 0.001 |
Length of columnar lined epithelium ≥ 1 cm | 12.6% | 34.7% | ||
Any length of columnar lined epithelium in the esophagus | 64.2% | 29.3% | ||
Q3. How often do you use the Prague C and M criteria in your assessment of Barrett’s esophagus? | All the time | 11.3% | 22.4% | < 0.001 |
> 70% of the time | 4.5% | 15.4% | ||
30%-70% of the time | 8.7% | 15.4% | ||
< 30% of the time | 29.4% | 30.9% | ||
Never | 46.1% | 15.8% | ||
Q4. How comfortable are you with endoscopic assessment (white-light with or without advanced imaging technology) in the diagnosis of Barrett’s esophagus? | 100% comfortable | 17.1% | 8.1% | < 0.001 |
> 70% comfortable | 51.6% | 37.5% | ||
30%-70% comfortable | 24.2% | 34.4% | ||
< 30% comfortable | 6.5% | 15.4% | ||
Not at all | 0.6% | 4.6% | ||
Q5. What is your preferred histologic definition of Barrett’s esophagus? | Any columnar tissue | 35.2% | 39.4% | < 0.001 |
Specialized intestinal metaplasia | 16.8% | 36.3% | ||
Gastric metaplasia | 16.1% | 18.9% | ||
No histological confirmation required | 31.9% | 5.4% | ||
Q6. In your practice, how regular do you survey your long-segment Barrett’s esophagus without dysplasia? | Every 2 yr | 82.3% | 57.1% | < 0.001 |
Every 3 yr | 4.8% | 22.8% | ||
Every 5 yr | 1.6% | 4.6% | ||
None at all | 11.3% | 15.4% | ||
Q7. How often do you follow the Seattle protocol (i.e. four-quadrant biopsies every 2 cm) in your biopsies of Barrett’s esophagus during surveillance endoscopy? | All the time | 2.6% | 10.8% | < 0.001 |
> 70% of the time | 4.2% | 8.1% | ||
30%-70% of the time | 2.3% | 17.4% | ||
< 30% of the time | 17.7% | 44.4% | ||
Never | 73.2% | 19.3% | ||
Q8. What is your preferred treatment of Barrett’s esophagus without dysplasia? | Lifelong PPI | 15.8% | 27.8% | < 0.001 |
PPI only when patient has symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux or evidence of esophagitis | 81.9% | 64.5% | ||
Radiofrequency Ablation | 1.0% | 3.9% | ||
Anti-reflux procedure (e.g. fundoplication) | 1.3% | 3.9% | ||
Q9. For Barrett’s esophagus patients whose biopsies showed indefinite for dysplasia, your preferred approach is: | Confirm with second pathologist and repeat endoscopy after a course of PPI | 32.6% | 59.5% | < 0.001 |
Surveillance 6-monthly | 37.7% | 21.2% | ||
Surveillance yearly | 29.0% | 18.1% | ||
Surveillance 3-5 yearly | 0.6% | 1.2% | ||
Q10. For Barrett’s esophagus patients without a lesion but whose biopsies showed low grade dysplasia, your preferred approach is: | Surveillance 6-monthly | 61.9% | 47.9% | < 0.001 |
Surveillance yearly | 21.9% | 20.5% | ||
Surveillance 3-5 yearly | 1.0% | 2.7% | ||
Ablative therapy, e.gv., radiofrequency, cryotherapy, argon plasma coagulation | 1.0% | 19.7% | ||
Endoscopic mucosal resection | 1.6% | 6.6% | ||
Endoscopic submucosal dissection | 12.6% | 2.7% | ||
Q11. For Barrett’s esophagus patients without a lesion but whose biopsies showed high grade dysplasia, your preferred treatment is: | Endoscopic mucosal resection | 12.6% | 22.4% | < 0.001 |
Endoscopic submucosal dissection | 83.5% | 49.8% | ||
Ablative therapy, e.g., radiofrequency, cryotherapy, argon plasma coagulation | 2.6% | 21.6% | ||
Surgery, e.g., esophagectomy | 1.3% | 6.2% |
- Citation: Kew GS, Soh AYS, Lee YY, Gotoda T, Li YQ, Zhang Y, Chan YH, Siah KTH, Tong D, Law SYK, Ruszkiewicz A, Tseng PH, Lee YC, Chang CY, Quach DT, Kusano C, Bhatia S, Wu JCY, Singh R, Sharma P, Ho KY. Multinational survey on the preferred approach to management of Barrett’s esophagus in the Asia-Pacific region. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 13(4): 279-294
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v13/i4/279.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v13.i4.279